To: VaBthang4
Granted Lott was no great leader. But Hannity was right. If you don't like Lott's leadership, fine toss him out. But don't give into the libs to do it.
The cons who said, "good toss him" only emboldened the racebaiting of the left and gave them more strength to pull this *^*t again.
To: republicman
I am so much happier with Frist.
The Democrats did up a big favor. Thankfully the President is doing a great job and the DimocRATS have nothing new.
Thankfully Lott stayed in the Senate. I really have nothing against Lott. He just was not great at dealing with the kind of filth that exist in the person of Daschell (bigest Clymer on earth).
To: republicman
The cons who said, "good toss him" only emboldened the racebaiting of the left and gave them more strength to pull this *^*t again...absolutely correct bump.....
To: republicman
Your post is so right on that it cannot be said better and the result--"The cons who said, "good toss him" only emboldened the racebaiting of the left and gave them more strength to pull this" x "again." is already a prophetic reality.
Sean didn't have to be a prophet for that one to materialize. All he needed was the good sense he often exhibits AND HE WAS RIGHT.
He is blessed with brain as well as standards. I seriously doubt that he expects many to agree with him on every issue, nor do I believe that he is thin-skinned or immature.
That is just the neo-con contrivance that the left leaning segments want to use to goad him into their approval ratings assemblage. If he goes there he loses credibility with the greater numbers who still use their heads, experience, history and facts (rather than currently generated hype and fuzzy mush) to conclude what the continually obscured reality may be.
His reasonable tolerance firmly fixed into the bedrock of principle sets him apart and gives him a stature that others may envy but have not the blessed ability to even emulate.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson