[kidd]

I disagree completely with Bush (41) on the "worst" list. He shouldn't be on either list. The reasons given are bogus. No mention that he continued the successful policies of Reagan and conducted the "cleanest" war in American history. Bush's (41) biggest drawbacks are his complete inaction on abortion and his lie about no tax increases.

How could this author use the Bush-Noriega fantasy and completely ignore the Chinese campaign contributions to Clinton in exchange for nuclear secrets - which would solidly place Clinton at the top of the "worst" list?

[cousair]

Clinton's name should NEVER be included on any list of BEST PRESIDENTS....NEVER,NEVER!!

[Alberta's Child]

Regardless of the Bush-Noriega fantasy, I would point out that the U.S. invasion of Panama was one of the most disgraceful episodes in recent memory.

At least Milosevic wasn't brought here to stand trial.

[KC_Conspirator]

I disagree completely with Bush (41) on the "worst" list. He shouldn't be on either list. The reasons given are bogus. No mention that he continued the successful policies of Reagan and conducted the "cleanest" war in American history. Bush's (41) biggest drawbacks are his complete inaction on abortion and his lie about no tax increases.

The Kidd has it right. Bush 41' does not deserve to be on the worst list. His conduct on the war was superb - our forces put the world on notice that we were back. If you remember at the time the same yahoos who were talking about "quagmire" and "another Vietnam" were talking about the Persian Gulf War. It is not Bush's fault we stopped going to Baghdad, but rather the liberals, arabs, and their foolish UN policies.