Replies

I watched part of the DC demonstration on C-Span while some of the speakers were on. They mostly chanted slogans over and over and when Jesse Jackson came on in his pimp/Godfather-looking outfit I turned the channel because I couldn't take it anymore.

However, I am a bit leery of the war idea, because I'm afraid it will create more problems than it will solve. I hope I am wrong.

I am a bit leery of the war idea, because I'm afraid it will create more problems than it will solve. I hope I am wrong.

It should be interesting. I decided not to underestimate President Bush. Seems he usually knows what he's doing.

Seen these articles, btw?...

Entrapment by Bush:
He plays Democrats for fools,
and they always rise to his bait

The Rewards of Boldness

However, I am a bit leery of the war idea, because I'm afraid it will create more problems than it will solve. I hope I am wrong.

I'm beginning to believe it's too late for that.

IF we had a moral foreign policy to begin with, where we didn't run about the globe sticking our nose in where it didn't belong - then maybe so many nations wouldn't hate us.

But they Do hate us, and that's the reality we have to deal with.

So the question is this - do we allow nations like North Korea, Iraq, Iran, etc who hate us, and have a zealot based leadership and followers to possess weapons of mass destruction?

I'm beginning to think that No. is the answer. We may have to destroy each army, each goverment, each organization that poses a threat to us - until such time as we are so far advance that the weapons no longer pose a threat - or until all those possessing these weapons no longer have a reason to hate/want to attack us.

If we're going to lose a city, I'd sure rather it be Mecca than Omaha.

(Don't tempt me with LA as a response.... I might just give 'em that one as a freebie :) )