Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Right_in_Virginia
Never post and watch a basketball game on tv at the same time. I feel like an idiot,I know what Bakke was-sorry!. My impression today was that the brief filed did not go far enough and didn't ask specifically that race preferences be discarded in all college admission processes-just amended at the University of Michigan. Even though the University of Michigan is the school being sued-could the SCOTUS expand their ruling to include all universities-( assuming they rule against the U of M)?Or are they totally limited to just the U of M? If this is still unclear and it well may be at this late hour,I'll try again tomorrow. Thanks.
178 posted on 01/17/2003 9:39:05 PM PST by Wild Irish Rogue (Rockets win)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies ]


To: Wild Irish Rogue
Even if it is limited to Michigan, what happens is other judges will look at how SCOTUS decided it - reversals make judges look bad, you see - and as such, they will make their calls based on the ruling.
185 posted on 01/17/2003 9:46:09 PM PST by hchutch ("Last suckers crossed, Syndicate shot'em up" - Ice-T, "I'm Your Pusher")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 178 | View Replies ]

To: Wild Irish Rogue
Please reference my recent post to see how the establishment of PRECEDENT will effectively curtail race-based admissions policies without the having to take on the entireity of Affirmative Action.

In fact, a series of about three positive court rulings could neutralize AA and return us to a Martin Luther King style "colorblind" society.

226 posted on 01/18/2003 7:50:46 AM PST by copycat (Arbeit macht frei.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 178 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson