White House Brief Stops Short of Bush Speech (Folks, I really don't relish the next words)RUSH

rushlimbaughshow ^ | 1/17/2003 | RushLimbaugh

[Howlin]

Bait that nasty cliquish, racial trap........

I'm amazed you aren't struck by lightening for accusing ME of baiting a racial trap.

Anybody here can click on your replies and see who the racist is in this little exchange.

[Chong]

Simpleton I am and with a few Bud's in my belly, here's my simplerton view of the Brown case. Of course I could be totally wrong, but here's my take on it.

1. Brown wanted EQUAL opportunity to compete, not begging for preferential handout solely due to his race. He wanted to get in the golf course where he could shoot 67 on 18 holes, didn't want guilt ridden handicap pity points. ??

2. Today it means treating minority groups (excluding those who excel in edumacashion without the handouts) like some sub-human by saying that they need the extra 200+ points to get on the even ground with the rest of the race. Brown should be insulted.

3. The preferential treatment becomes the very obstacle Brown and the "minority" wanted/needed to overcome.

I am making sense only in my head I know, because I'm not as articulate as you, but it's not my fault. I wasn't given the 200+ extra points.

[Joe Hadenuf]

Call in all the lackys and slack jawed followers.....

[Howlin]

Call in all the lackys and slack jawed followers.....

You're already here.

[MJY1288]

You came here Jose, And I might add, In your usual flair

[Joe Hadenuf]

Anybody here can click on your replies and see who the racist is in this little exchange.

And to keep the digital record straight, could you be a little specific on these nasty accusations of vile finger pointing of racism.....

[Howlin]

well, fancy meeting you here:

Somebody said this about you last night:

a poster makes a vile, offensive, racial insinuation to a comment I made regarding President Bush and conservatism

And they didn't even ping you!

[MJY1288]

Why don't you go and fart in someone else's elevator. Your never on topic, Just inflamatory remarks and play the victim when someones calls you on it

[Joe Hadenuf]

Just inflamatory remarks

Which remarks were those?

[MJY1288]

ROFLMAO, Your posting history looks like it should be proudly displayed on David Dukes Website. I have never seen you make one single remark that was anything but inflamatory

[Chong]

"Why would you have him arrested? Is he a Mexican, too?"

Hehehehehehehe...........
Yep, I've read plenty of his posts in the past and I must say that you are a 'race trap' for not agreeing with him.

[Joe Hadenuf]

Just inflamatory remarks

Which remarks were those?

[A Citizen Reporter]

"but if Bush and Olsen do not waste their breath, and the Court's time, being redundant, they have caved?"

If you're Landmark Legal, apparently you call it "splitting the baby to give cover to O'Connor and Kennedy."

Myself, I see that not as a legal argument, but as hyperbole. I've seen better legal arguments from people on this thread that I didn't know were attorneys.

[Joe Hadenuf]

Hehehehehehehe...........

Good response Chong.....

[MJY1288]

If I was you, I don't think I would be laughing at that remark. Comprehension Joe, Comprehension

[nicollo]

Now there's a challenge.

Are you sure that "Brown wanted EQUAL opportunity to compete, not begging for preferential handout solely due to his race"?

I'm with you on that. I think so. That case is so central to this issue that I can't begin to understand why we've ignored it on the conservative side. I see it labeled "judicial activism" in the liberal press. I don't take it that way. Seems to me a fundamental statement, consistent with American ideals. I think the liberal elevation of it has shorn it of its essentially conservative nature.

Nobody's disagreed, anyway, including you.

No, no, you affirm it:

The preferential treatment becomes the very obstacle Brown and the "minority" wanted/needed to overcome.

Bing! Twenty points!

[Joe Hadenuf]

Why don't you go and fart in someone else's elevator. Your never on topic, Just inflamatory remarks and play the victim when someones calls you on it

This is the third time I have asked you, WHAT INFLAMATORY REMARKS??

[Wild Irish Rogue]

Never post and watch a basketball game on tv at the same time. I feel like an idiot,I know what Bakke was-sorry!. My impression today was that the brief filed did not go far enough and didn't ask specifically that race preferences be discarded in all college admission processes-just amended at the University of Michigan. Even though the University of Michigan is the school being sued-could the SCOTUS expand their ruling to include all universities-( assuming they rule against the U of M)?Or are they totally limited to just the U of M? If this is still unclear and it well may be at this late hour,I'll try again tomorrow. Thanks.

[MJY1288]

Would you mind asking me for a fourth time?

[Chong]

"Good response Chong....."

Thanks, it shore was, wasn't it?