Skip to comments.
Police say 6 year old brought marijuana to school
AP ^
| January 17, 2003
| KESQ NEWS
Posted on 01/17/2003 8:01:41 AM PST by robertpaulsen
Parents in the high-desert say it's not what they expected their six year old' to learn in school, but police say teachers at Yucca Valley Elementary noticed one of their first graders doing a show-and-tell with marijuana they say he brought to school. The boy's parents are under arrest for child endangerment.
In elementary school, kids are thinking about recess and what's for lunch. You don't think drugs are even in the picture. But yesterday, police say drugs were at school, brought there by a first grader.
It's not what you'd ever expect a six year old to bring to school, a bag of marijuana, a pipe to smoke it in, and a lighter. But police say a first grader at Yucca Valley Elementary had all three of these things on campus, showing them off to his young classmates
Jennifer Whittemore's son Caleb is seven years old. Too young, she thought, to understand what marijuana is. Now she says it's a topic she's going to have to tackle
I've warned my kids, but they don't know what it looks like. He would think it was candy.
Police say a teacher found the boy with the drugs Tuesday morning, and quickly took them away and called the San Bernardino Sheriff's Department. Sgt. Fred Gonzales says the 6 year old knew what the drugs were, and told them exactly where he had found them.
He told police he picked the marijuana up at his home, says Sgt. Gonzales.
After police interviewed the boy, they came here, where they say they found even more drug paraphernalia inside the home.
The boy's father, Douglas Ballard, and his live-in girlfriend, Heather Peterson, were arrested for willful cruelty and child endangerment. And police say they've been to their home before to search for drugs. Both are now behind bars, on $100,000 bail.
As for the boy, he is now living with relatives.
We did speak with school officials, but they did not want to comment on the incident.
TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: child; elementary; endangerment; marijuana; school; yukkavalley
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-56 next last
"were arrested for willful cruelty and child endangerment."I would say that this qualifies as an answer to the question, "Who is hurt by marijuana, other than the user?"
To: All
2
posted on
01/17/2003 8:02:35 AM PST
by
Support Free Republic
(Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
To: robertpaulsen
Tip of the iceberg situation.....Yucca Valley, with it's breezy openness (to get rid of the whiff) is the undisputed Meth Lab capital of southern Kalifornia.
3
posted on
01/17/2003 8:05:13 AM PST
by
ErnBatavia
((Bumperootus!))
To: robertpaulsen
But the legalize it crowd will say the boy is being hurt becuase his parents were arrested because of some harmless drugs.
I don't buy that argument, but that's their comeback.
To: robertpaulsen
The boy's father, Douglas Ballard, and his live-in girlfriend, Heather Peterson, were arrested for willful cruelty and child endangerment..For some strange reason, I fail to see how this parent was "willfully cruel" to his child for merely posessing marijuana. Hey may be guilty of stupidity, perhaps, but "willful cruelty"?
And police say they've been to their home before to search for drugs. Both are now behind bars, on $100,000 bail.
And Now the child is in the hands of CPS, or in a foster home....certainly that is a far less "cruel" environment. < /sarcasm >
5
posted on
01/17/2003 8:15:37 AM PST
by
deaconblues
(Repeal the 21st amendment!)
To: robertpaulsen
"I would say that this qualifies as an answer to the question, "Who is hurt by marijuana, other than the user?" "Do you mean hurt like in the sense of if the parents had cigarettes or alcohol around the house that the kids had gotten a hold of?
6
posted on
01/17/2003 8:15:37 AM PST
by
Kerberos
To: robertpaulsen
WILLFUL CRUELTY?!
Puh-lease!
To: robertpaulsen; Howlin; justshe
I think you'll find a cute little contrarianite Lozerdopian band here at FR that will ask [with a Labored straight face]...
"What's the problem?"
8
posted on
01/17/2003 8:17:40 AM PST
by
VaBthang4
To: robertpaulsen
R.P. you know i'm ususally on the other side of the argument and as you know I don't badger or call people names, I try to be logical and state my case intellectually. Indeed this was not good, but you know the kid could just have easily brought in a bottle of Jack Daniels, diet pills or tobacco products all of which are a suspendable violation. The only difference is that pot's not legal over the counter. Now with that said please don't misconstrue what I said to thinking that i condone 6 year olds doing any of thee above.
To: Kerberos
Geez, if only he'd brought in a 6-pack of beer, everything would have been fine, downright patriotic, even.
10
posted on
01/17/2003 8:17:59 AM PST
by
Wolfie
(Marijuana is much to expensive to waste on kids.)
To: deaconblues
I agree.
To: robertpaulsen
I've warned my kids, but they don't know what it looks like. He would think it was candy. If true, she must have stupid kids, while they may have no reason to know what pot looks, smells, tastes like, but it sure isn't candy!
12
posted on
01/17/2003 8:21:35 AM PST
by
StriperSniper
(Start heating the TAR, I'll go get the FEATHERS.)
To: HELLRAISER II
Teachers took the drugs from the little boy, and then told him to go take his Ritalin.
13
posted on
01/17/2003 8:23:50 AM PST
by
Wolfie
(Marijuana is much to expensive to waste on kids.)
To: deaconblues
Either you didn't read the entire article or you're trying to paint the picture worse than it is: "As for the boy, he is now living with relatives."
To: StriperSniper
Oh no son, that's oregno.
To: Wolfie
"Geez, if only he'd brought in a 6-pack of beer, everything would have been fine, downright patriotic, even. "Might have been cause for a tailgate party.
Seems to me that with marijuana the child would have had to figure out how to get the seeds out, roll it up, and put a light to it. With a beer, all they would of had to do is figure out how to pop the top. Given the logic put forth here, beer would seem to be more of a child endangerment issue.
16
posted on
01/17/2003 8:28:47 AM PST
by
Kerberos
To: HELLRAISER II
Oh no son, that's oregno. Expensive, imported, oregano. So keep your grubby little mitts off of Daddy's OREGANO!!! ;-)
17
posted on
01/17/2003 8:29:30 AM PST
by
StriperSniper
(Start heating the TAR, I'll go get the FEATHERS.)
To: Wolfie
And don't forget your parents were funding Terrorists to. Please give me a break, the parents are guilty of nothing but being stupid.
To: HELLRAISER II
Heck, you mean they drive an SUV too? Dang.
19
posted on
01/17/2003 8:30:57 AM PST
by
Wolfie
To: for-q-clinton
Either you didn't read the entire article or you're trying to paint the picture worse than it is: "As for the boy, he is now living with relatives."FWIW, I was more focused on the "willful cruelty" charges.
Now, I am certain that intrusive state was not involved in the child's current living arrangement in any way. After all, ANY relatives are, better for suited to raise a child than a pot-smoking parent. < /sarcasm >
20
posted on
01/17/2003 8:31:25 AM PST
by
deaconblues
(Repeal the 21st amendment!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-56 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson