Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: deaconblues
Either you didn't read the entire article or you're trying to paint the picture worse than it is: "As for the boy, he is now living with relatives."
14 posted on 01/17/2003 8:24:29 AM PST by for-q-clinton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: for-q-clinton
Either you didn't read the entire article or you're trying to paint the picture worse than it is: "As for the boy, he is now living with relatives."

FWIW, I was more focused on the "willful cruelty" charges.

Now, I am certain that intrusive state was not involved in the child's current living arrangement in any way. After all, ANY relatives are, better for suited to raise a child than a pot-smoking parent. < /sarcasm >

20 posted on 01/17/2003 8:31:25 AM PST by deaconblues (Repeal the 21st amendment!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson