Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MrLeRoy
I wrote, "If conjoined twins are born, such that there are two bodies (or parts of bodies), sharing a single brain, do you think that both bodies (or parts of bodies) have a "right to life?" That is, do you think it should be against the law to cut away one body (or part of a body), to produce a single live body and brain?"

Mr. LeRoy responded, "No."

Well, if those bodies, or parts of bodies, have no right to life, why does a collection of cells that ALSO has no brain, have a "right to life?"
340 posted on 02/05/2003 3:15:54 PM PST by Mark Bahner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 339 | View Replies ]


To: Mark Bahner
if those bodies, or parts of bodies, have no right to life, why does a collection of cells that ALSO has no brain, have a "right to life?"

Because it has the potential to have a reasoning free-willed brain.

341 posted on 02/05/2003 3:25:10 PM PST by MrLeRoy ("That government is best which governs least.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 340 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson