Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Mark Bahner
if those bodies, or parts of bodies, have no right to life, why does a collection of cells that ALSO has no brain, have a "right to life?"

Because it has the potential to have a reasoning free-willed brain.

341 posted on 02/05/2003 3:25:10 PM PST by MrLeRoy ("That government is best which governs least.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 340 | View Replies ]


To: Mark Bahner
... as I already explained at length in post #308.
342 posted on 02/05/2003 3:28:30 PM PST by MrLeRoy ("That government is best which governs least.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 341 | View Replies ]

To: MrLeRoy
"Because it has the potential to have a reasoning free-willed brain."

OK, does an anencephalitic fetus have a "right to life?" That is, a right to be born (since they are guaranteed to die, within, at most, a few days)?

http://www.mit.edu/afs/net.mit.edu/project/attic/usa-today/news/43
343 posted on 02/05/2003 3:37:01 PM PST by Mark Bahner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 341 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson