1 posted on
01/15/2003 5:43:28 AM PST by
SJackson
2 posted on
01/15/2003 5:55:11 AM PST by
Mo1
(Join the DC Chapter at the Patriots Rally III on 1/18/03)
To: SJackson
--"legacy enrollment"--another stupidity that would make no difference to me if no Federal tax money went to the institution that wants to practise it--
To: SJackson
Edward M. Kennedy may have been a legacy student at Harvard, but only after first having attending and having been expelled from Yale.
To: SJackson
Now, calls to abandon the legacy preference are on the rise from minority groups and politicians who see it as a perpetuation of class distinction and white advantage. SURE THING as long as affirmative action BS is gotten rid of everywhere.
9 posted on
01/15/2003 6:45:40 AM PST by
dennisw
(http://www.littlegreenfootballs.com/weblog/weblog.php)
To: SJackson
Big big diff. The parents of the legacy students actually shell out cold hard cash in alumni contributions. Therefore subsidizing the edumacashuns of aggrieved minorities via upkeep, scholarships etc. (Yes I know that many minority students have no chip on their shoulder and are grateful to get this education)
Show me the money baby!
12 posted on
01/15/2003 6:57:28 AM PST by
dennisw
(http://www.littlegreenfootballs.com/weblog/weblog.php)
To: SJackson
A "legacy preference" is color blind. Yes, there may indeed be more white than black admitted under this scheme.
But then maybe we should examine "sports preferences" (which include scholarships, BTW). This too is color blind, but what is the racial make-up of the recipients?
Would the author suggest eliminating both?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson