Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Surf's Up Dude Surf's Up, Dude
SF Gate (Chronicle) ^ | January 16th, 2003 | Adam Sparks

Posted on 01/14/2003 7:07:05 AM PST by sfwarrior

Californians love their coast, all 1,100 miles of it. They like it open and free, without any of those nasty oil rigs and other major developments encumbering their views.

The state's voters created the California Coastal Commission in 1972 to regulate development and preserve the coastal environment, but the Coastal Commission hit a gnarly wave when a state appeals court ruled just three weeks ago that the commission itself is unconstitutional. Bummer, dude.

The ruling involved a French marine scientist, a new design for an artificial reef, a hard-working environmental group, rubber tires and the commission's abuse of power. It all started when Rodolphe Streichenberger founded the Marine Forests Society, a nonprofit foundation based in Newport Beach that has many enthusiastic volunteers committed to ocean restoration.

Streichenberger, who had studied the total deterioration of California's once-flourishing reef habitat and researched how to restore marine life in general and shellfish in particular, wanted to create underwater forests of marine life within the dead coastal zones. He concluded that shellfish have a vital function in developing growth in marine ecosystems and determined that rebuilding a shellfish habitat can restore the balance of living organisms that help create the ocean's ecosystem. Similarly, Streichenberger believes that when shellfish populations are depleted, the natural ecological balance of marine habitat is simultaneously and irreparably damaged, resulting in the disappearance of the dependent plant and fish life.

Further study led him to conclude that the shellfish depletion was a major factor causing the destruction of more than 90 percent of California's natural sea-life habitat. This ecosystem had once provided shelter, food and spawning grounds for bountiful fish populations. Streichenberger believed that, although rebuilding these natural habitats, like reefs, could take hundreds of years, the lost marine forests could be re-created through planting of cultivated artificial reefs. He decided to bring his first experimental reef project to the nutrient-rich, sandy shores near Newport Beach.

Streichenberger hadn't planned on the intractability of the allegedly pro-environmental Coastal Commission, however. He received approval from Newport Beach officials and a lease from the state Department of Fish and Game, but the commission wanted no part of it and in 1993 determined that the project violated the Coastal Act. What kind of commission could reason that a nonprofit and non-government-funded reef-restoration project is a violation of its mandate? Go figure.

Surprisingly, the Coastal Commission refused to give the Marine Forests Society a permit to help restore sea life. This was one of the first marine coastal-restoration projects even considered by the commission, which normally just approves building permits on land. Whether this denial was due to the commission's pro-development makeup or because the society was not making the right campaign donations to the right politicians, we'll never know.

In 1993, the Marine Forests Society's volunteers planted the first artificial reef some 300 meters off the Balboa Peninsula, near Newport Beach. The project built the artificial reef with used tires -- which are not toxic when immersed in seawater -- placed in long rows and then attached to the sandy bottom. Vertical columns of floating plastic tubes were then connected to the tires. Shellfish such as mussels, as well as seaweed, were then placed within this structure.

Within time, other marine species flourished in the new habitat. Several years later, the Marine Forests Society announced that its Newport Beach experiment "supports a higher density of marine life than has ever been seen on any artificial reef previously built in California. " Streichenberger suggested that this process could have a dramatic impact if replicated throughout California. But the reward for his inventiveness and hard work in this field was not a grant from the Coastal Commission nor a Nobel prize. It was a lawsuit.

After it was denied the permit, the Marine Forests Society sued, asserting, among other charges, that the Coastal Commission itself was unconstitutional. Fat chance, you might think. But ol' Neptune must have been smiling on the Marine Forests Society, because the Third District Court of Appeals agreed with the organization. The court ruled that because the commission is an executive body with executive powers, it could not have a... READ THE ENTIRE ARTICLE!

(Excerpt) Read more at sfgate.com ...


TOPICS: Activism/Chapters; Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: agency; appeals; calgov2002; coastalcommission; courts; decision; enviralists; environment; marinepreservation; ocean; unconstitutional
It's about time that the courts have ruled a law or agency unconstitutional for the right reasons, unlike when a lower court ruled Prop. 187 unconsitutional (the anti-illegal alien proposition passed by the voters).
1 posted on 01/14/2003 7:07:05 AM PST by sfwarrior
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeenTheLight; American Preservative; nastypumps; sfwarrior; mac_truck; SeenTheLights Mom; ...
Ping
2 posted on 01/14/2003 7:12:12 AM PST by sfwarrior
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: *Enviralists
Enviro-mentalist wacko ping.
3 posted on 01/14/2003 7:15:09 AM PST by anymouse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sfwarrior
Good read, thank you.
4 posted on 01/14/2003 7:21:28 AM PST by Carry_Okie (The environment is too complex and too important to be managed by politics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sfwarrior
Here in the Twin Cities we have a government body called "The Metropolitan Council". This body is not elected but appointed. They have a great deal to say about what gets built, where and when. They push mass transit and discourage new road construction. They only authorize sewer and water facilities for certain areas.

It would be very nice if they could be ruled unconstitutional.

5 posted on 01/14/2003 7:24:04 AM PST by toast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Donate Here By Secure Server

Or mail checks to
FreeRepublic , LLC
PO BOX 9771
FRESNO, CA 93794
or you can use
PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com

Become A Monthly Donor
STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD
Thanks Registered

6 posted on 01/14/2003 7:24:33 AM PST by Mo1 (Join the DC Chapter at the Patriots Rally III on 1/18/03)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: toast
The Metropolitan Council might be unconstitutional. What got the court here to rule that way, is that the agency does an executive function, but is appointed by legislators as opposed to the governor.
Find a deep pocket opponent of the commission, someone who is getting screwed and then, put them in touch with the Pacific Legal Foundation in Sacramento, Ca. They are a free, non-profit, CONSERVATIVE, law firm!
7 posted on 01/14/2003 7:29:27 AM PST by sfwarrior
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: sfwarrior
"Corruption in the Coastal Commission has been well reported recently. It was an issue in the recent gubernatorial campaign when former Commissioner Mark Nathanson was convicted of soliciting bribes in exchange for permits."

Just as long as the elitist, wealthy friends of Blackout Davis who live in Malibu don't have to see or be concerned about common people mucking about on their ocean view. Streisand has far more important things to worry about besides constantly shooing little people from her beach! BTW, is it true that her husband is fooling around with the young woman who was walking her dog?

8 posted on 01/14/2003 7:31:17 AM PST by Tacis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: toast
The California Coastal Commission was ruled un-Constitutional because they are an executive body, most of whose members are appointed by the legislature - thus violating the separation of powers doctrine.

How about your Metro Council?
9 posted on 01/14/2003 7:33:54 AM PST by Redbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Tacis
Streisand has far more important things to worry about besides constantly shooing little people from her beach! BTW, is it true that her husband is fooling around with the young woman who was walking her dog?

If you woke up with that B*&ch every morning wouldn't you. Also, with a nose like hers, if she could bend over that far, who would need a man around the house.

10 posted on 01/14/2003 7:45:28 AM PST by NC Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Tacis
BTW, is it true that her husband is fooling around with the young woman who was walking her dog?

LOL...who would ever cheat on "Beezer"? ;o)
11 posted on 01/14/2003 7:52:56 AM PST by mr.pink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: toast
Keep a close eye on what happens to the California Coastal Commission, because what happens to them will most likely set a precedent that will allow the citizens of your state to bring action against your "Metropolitan Council".

Bah. These "commissions" and "councils" are nothing but a humbug, a cheap ploy that produces nothing except an ever expanding sea of extended hands reaching into the pockets of private citizens. It would be nice to see the CCC put out of business.
12 posted on 01/14/2003 10:33:27 AM PST by Billy_bob_bob ("He who will not reason is a bigot;He who cannot is a fool;He who dares not is a slave." W. Drummond)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: sfwarrior; *calgov2002; snopercod; Grampa Dave; Carry_Okie; SierraWasp; Gophack; RonDog; ...
Thjanks for the post and the ping!

This may turn out to be a very big deal!

I think this was the area that Davis used to get his start in politics!
Others know much more about this than I.

calgov2002:

calgov2002: for old calgov2002 articles. 

calgov2002: for new calgov2002 articles. 

Other Bump Lists at: Free Republic Bump List Register




13 posted on 01/14/2003 1:04:31 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach (Impeach Gray Davis!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Bump
14 posted on 01/14/2003 1:15:53 PM PST by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ... Please Donate or Try Going Monthly!!! You Can .. And DO Make a Difference!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: *Enviralists
http://www.freerepublic.com/perl/bump-list
15 posted on 01/14/2003 4:09:57 PM PST by Libertarianize the GOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson