Skip to comments.
Bush set to break silence in race case
Washington Times ^
| 1/14/03
| Bill Sammon
Posted on 01/13/2003 9:47:44 PM PST by kattracks
Edited on 07/12/2004 4:00:22 PM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-47 last
To: kattracks; mhking
I fully disagree with any admission policy based entirely on grades as some supposed "equalizer" that provides us to "fairly compare" the different students. Anyone who's ever been to school knows that even within one school the politics surrounding grades are nearly as important as the work going into any given test or assignment. Turn in a paper in a literature class and you might well discover more about how the teacher feels about you than how your paper stacks up against someone else's. It's just a fact.
Then there's the issue of comparing grades from one school to the next. Who knows if the name of the school really gives insight into the ability of the student? If only children of the rich and powerful go to the Yales and Harvards, then who knows if the students are actually better? Cannot a student at Kansas State or Ohio State be just as quality, if not more so?
Then there's the issue of the interests of the school. If this school wants a kid who can also throw a football 100 yards in a perfect spiral, then isn't that a gift that that school should be allowed to consider?
Shouldn't they be permitted to consider other giftednesses that particular students bring with them? If Student A is a gifted student AND a gifted musician, why cannot RahRah University choose them over a student with a slightly higher GPA who doesn't bring that added gift of musical ability?
If a school wants to cater to students who will eventually work in rural, inner-city, or international regions of need, shouldn't that calling be something that the school can consider, even if the student has a GPA that is lower but is still admirable? (How do you compare GPA's anyhow, as mentioned above?)
41
posted on
01/14/2003 8:47:29 AM PST
by
xzins
To: Redbob; rdb3; mhking; Poohbah
That is 100% unadulterated crap - there are far more than your totals on Free Republic alone.
Damn, with friends like you, who needs the Left's race-baiters?
42
posted on
01/14/2003 8:54:50 AM PST
by
hchutch
("Last suckers crossed, Syndicate shot'em up" - Ice-T, "I'm Your Pusher")
To: Redbob; hchutch; rdb3
at the risk of alienating the 3 or 4 Blacks who might someday vote RepublicanDon't want us around, eh? Guess that shows how "much" credibility you've got on the matter.
Don't like that we're 'round? Good. I'm here to stay anyway. Have a nice day.
43
posted on
01/14/2003 9:16:25 AM PST
by
mhking
(Just damn.)
To: mhking
Don't like that we're 'round? Good. I'm here to stay anyway.Ya heard? That's right. Now nod ya heads to this...
We ain't
Go-in' nowhere
We ain't
Goin' nowhere
We can't be stopped now
Cuz we're blacks on the Right...
;-)
Birth of Tha SYNDICATE, the philosophical heir to William Lloyd Garrison.
101 things that the Mozilla browser can do that Internet Explorer cannot.
44
posted on
01/14/2003 9:33:34 AM PST
by
rdb3
(Snatch Je$$e Jack$on out his S-Class for fakin'...)
To: Redbob
This is the most crucial moment for conservatives in the past two decades. With Sharpton poised to shake up the black vote block in the Democratic party next year, we want and need the support of all black conservatives. We have a chance next year to once and for all put a stake in the heart of the Dem vampire, the new black conservative movement could be the mallet.
45
posted on
01/14/2003 11:40:28 AM PST
by
SandfleaCSC
(Yes, I'm bad, but you all knew that anyway)
To: SandfleaCSC
I was active in the fight for Prop 209, which almost was lost because of the weakness and total stupidity of the Dole campaign. We ended up very well but still lost the votes of many Democrats who hate racial preferences (votes which we had before the ham-handed entry of the California Republican Party and the Dole campaign.
I will not say anything right now about President Bush's decision on or before Thursday.
Now we all will get a real clear look at the stuff that President Bush is made of.
46
posted on
01/15/2003 3:01:13 AM PST
by
AJAY
To: AJAY
Yes, we do and he continues to stay off the plantation.
47
posted on
01/15/2003 9:56:43 AM PST
by
Mfkmmof4
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-47 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson