Music, technology groups agree on copyright plans

Associated Press | January 13, 2003 | TED BRIDIS

[Anti-Bubba182]

DONATE TODAY!!!. SUPPORT FREE REPUBLIC

Donate Here By Secure Server

Or mail checks to
FreeRepublic , LLC
PO BOX 9771
FRESNO, CA 93794

or you can use

PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com
STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD

[Bush2000]

"I hope the rest of the creative and technological communities get on board with a unifying message and ... we can tone down the divisive rhetoric that has otherwise predominated many copyright and technology debates," Berman said in a statement.

Hey! He's talking about you!

[TechJunkYard]

The agreement was negotiated among the Recording Industry Association of America, the Business Software Alliance and the Computer Systems Policy Project.

That's nice... the RIAA, BSA (that's basically Microsoft) and CSPP (a consortium of OEMs). Who's representing the walletsconsumers?

[Chancellor Palpatine]

Looks like all the whores were on board for that agreement, demanding that us cunsumers stop calling 'em whores.

[per loin]

Officials with those organizations declined Monday to discuss the agreement in any detail, except saying they had achieved "landmark consensus." Industry executives and others described its provisions on condition of anonymity for The Associated Press.

What are they trying to hide?

[weikel]

Be careful if this goes through you could get layed off from RIAA shilling.

[Bush2000]

I'd welcome it if every one of you smug bastards lost the ability to rip your crappy CDs...

[Dimensio]

The agreement could affect a controversial bill by Sen. Ernest "Fritz" Hollings, D-S.C., that would prohibit the manufacture or distribution of "digital media devices" -- such as handheld music players -- unless they include government-approved copy restriction technology

This is inaccurate, unless Ernest Hollings, D-Disney, has rewritten his bill since its last incarnation. It was written to prohibit manufacture or distribution of any "digital electronic device" that did not contain federally-approvide DRM-controlling hardware. This would affect the cost of almost any electronic device, even ones that could never be used for digital piracy, and it would possibly make 'non-approved' operating systems (like Linux) illegal because it would be unlikely that the 'approved' DRM management scheme would fit with the Linux development method (likely closed-source, and the user wouldn't be able to remove it from the OS).

[Bush2000]

Capitalism. What an inconvenience, huh?

[bfree]

Maybe your smug "artist" buddies will realize that music sales are down because most of them suck and CD's are too expensive for the value received, and NOT because of downloading.

[Bush2000]

Maybe your smug "artist" buddies will realize that music sales are down because most of them suck and CD's are too expensive for the value received, and NOT because of downloading.

Rrrrrrrrrrrrright. And in your world, gravity isn't holding us to the ground. It's all our imagination. /NOT

[Dimensio]

How is the scenario I described 'capitalism'? I don't see how forcing restrictive and unnecessary DRM garbage onto all computer hardware and software that will increase prices and reduce consumer and business choice goes along well with 'capitalism'.

[bfree]

Oh really. The American Music Awards show had it's lowest ratings ever last night. People are losing interest in minimally talented egotists. Just a fact.

[bfree]

Oh really. The American Music Awards show had it's lowest ratings ever last night. People are losing interest in minimally talented egotists. Just a fact.

[FreeTally]

I'm curious. Are you saying that sales are down because people have simply stopped buying music because its crappy?

[bfree]

It certainly plays a big part. As does the cost.

[FreeTally]

It certainly plays a big part.

So, I'd expect internet downloading of music to be "down" as well. But it isn't, now is it?

As does the cost.

Oh, the cost. You mean the difference between $13 and free? You do realize that the price of CD's hasn't mysteriously risen over the past four years, don't you? Prices are the lowest they have ever been. Why is "cost" a problem now? Oh, almost forgot - because a legitimate price can not compete with free. Five years ago, the comparison for a consumer was $17.99 at Sam Goody or $12.99 at Best Buy or Circuit City. Now, its retail stores at $9.99 to $17.99 competing against free music.

[bfree]

Maybe in a soft economy price matters when the quality is not must have stuff. Downloads of singles are rising so one isn't forced to buy crap wtih it for $13. By the way if the music industry is in such good health artisticly speaking, why are ratings dropping and why is MTV showing fewer music videos? Sliding demand for poor quality?

[Right Wing Professor]

In other news, the foxes and the coyotes today reached a historic accord on how to protect the chicken coop.