I have observed women are more likely to stick in a bad situation rather than risk going it alone, although "tough" new abuse laws and programs make the man just the payor.Perhaps what we have now is the result of generations of women voting for the kind of gov't which punishes men in general and reduces the risks in dealing with the natural consequences of non-marital sex and preferring "bad boys" over solid "dull" men (who build, plan, and believe in a just God).
I have observed women are more likely to stick in a bad situation rather than risk going it alone, although "tough" new abuse laws and programs make the man just the payor.Perhaps what we have now is the result of generations of women voting for the kind of gov't which punishes men in general and reduces the risks in dealing with the natural consequences of non-marital sex and preferring "bad boys" over solid "dull" men (who build, plan, and believe in a just God).
Could you please expound your theory that the women's vote is the major contributing factor to the downfall of the country?
It is a direct, and correlated phenomenon.
The rise of the social spending started with giving the vote to women. It's documented.
They have proven themselves, on average, of being unfit for the responsibility of living in a Republic. (Which is why we ain't one now...)
Of course, if one had a legal structure where it was impossible for legislators to transfer money from one person to another, it wouldn't matter what woman wanted.
The writing is on the wall, we're just reading it.