Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: freepatriot32
Stanford Climatologist Steven Schneider started this smear campaign against Bjorn Lomborg. But Schneider is hardly always a paragon of scientific integrity. In a now famous interview with Discover magazine, Schneider showed his true colors:

On the one hand, as scientists we are ethically bound to the scientific method, in effect promising to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but - which means that we must include all the doubts, the caveats, the ifs, ands and buts. On the other hand, we are not jus t scientists but human beings as well. And like most people, we'd like to see the world a better place, which in this context translates into our working to reduce the risk of potentially disastrous climate change. To do that, we need to get some broad-based support, to capture the public's imagination. That, of co urse, entails getting loads of media coverage. So we have to offer up scary scenarios, make simplified, dramat ic statements, and make little mention of any doubts we might have. ? Each of us has to decide what the right balance is between being effective and being honest."

Source: A Smear Continues

http://www.techcentralstation.com/1051/envirowrapper.jsp?PID=1051-450&CID=1051-010803F

The above URL maps to the hotlink above it.

8 posted on 01/11/2003 10:35:39 PM PST by StopGlobalWhining
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: StopGlobalWhining
Why must they resort to a smear campain?

Because they can't refute the facts that Lomborg printed in his book.

From The Skeptical Environmentalist, by Bjorn Lomborg

"We have more leisure time, greater security, less pollution, fewer accidents, more education, more amenities, higher incomes, and fewer starving people than any other generation in history."

"For less than one year's cost of meeting Kyoto," he said, "we could provide systems for clean drinking water that would save 2 million lives a year."

"…The Worldwatch Institute has claimed that the world's forests have 'declined significantly' in recent decades. In fact, the longest data series, gathered by a United Nations agency, shows that global forest cover grew between 1950 and 1994. In particular, the institute noted, Canada is loosing 200,000 hectares of forest a year." On checking the quoted source, Mr. Lomborg finds that Canada's forests grew by 174,000 hectares a year.

This is representative: the book exposes countless errors, evasions, and distortions of this sort.

The truth hurts, and the bit dogs are howling.
9 posted on 01/12/2003 3:29:07 PM PST by PeaceBeWithYou (We will not tire, we will not falter, and we will not fail.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson