Skip to comments.
The Cross Burning Case: What Really Happened
National Review Online ^
| January 9, 2003
| Byron York
Posted on 01/09/2003 8:00:18 AM PST by Quilla
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-50 last
To: Quilla
Bumping so I can find this later.
41
posted on
01/16/2004 9:54:47 PM PST
by
barker
(The Democratic Party has become the leading enemy of the American Republic.....headsonpikes)
To: Howlin
Thanks for the ping
Clinton Admin lets 2 guys off while Pickering sends one to jail and then the Dems lie about what really happen
I have a few words I'd like to say to the Dems ... but Jim has rules
42
posted on
01/16/2004 10:10:49 PM PST
by
Mo1
(Join the dollar a day crowd now!)
To: Quilla
Bookmarking ! ...![](http://rmeek141.home.comcast.net/MeekABump.gif)
43
posted on
01/17/2004 5:20:28 AM PST
by
MeekOneGOP
(Freeper formerly known as MeeknMing)
To: PhiKapMom
This needs widespread dissemination IMO!Don't bother. Judge Pickering's opponents don't oppose him because they are unaware of the facts-they oppose him in spite of the facts.
We, who deal in fact, logic and argument are constantly submarined by the left, for whom fact and logic are relative terms, useful only insofar as they produce a desired result.
They are not opposed to Pickering because he is not a good guy. THEY ALREADY KNOW HE IS A GOOD GUY.
They are not opposed to Pickering because of bad decisions he has rendered. THEY ALREADY KNOW HIS VERDICTS ARE UNIMPEACHABLE.
They are not opposed to Pickering because he lacks judicial temperament. THEY ALREADY KNOW HIS JUDICIAL DEMEANOR IS EXCELLENT.
It is a waste of breath to try to convince Schumer et al of the facts which they already know.
Our energy should be devoted to the same vigorous political combat that the other side excels at.
Ask yourself this: When President Xlinton nominated the radical left activist Ruth Bader Ginsburg to the Supreme Court (not a Circuit Court, mind you-to the freaking UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT!!!)-how much time was spent in floor debate and how many Republicans voted against her?
To: jackbill
How come you don't hear them complain about the Reno Justice Department letting the other two off with a misdemeanor? How come?Because THEY don't EVER betray those who fight for socialism, and THEY NEVER fail to attack those who oppose it.
By any means necessary.
To: Jim Noble
Unbelievable -- August 03, 1993 - Confirmed by the Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 96-3. Record Vote No: 232.
46
posted on
01/17/2004 5:35:31 PM PST
by
PhiKapMom
(AOII Mom -- Support Bush-Cheney '04)
To: Quilla
bttt
47
posted on
01/17/2004 5:46:17 PM PST
by
tje
(There is nothing more serious than pleasure.)
To: Quilla
Thank you for this post. It's so important for us to have FACTS to refute the Dims half truths or outright lies.
I read someone is sending this to Schumer. I'll send it to Kerry.
To: PhiKapMom
Unbelievable -- August 03, 1993 - Confirmed by the Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 96-3. Record Vote No: 232.Yes, I know. It was a rhetorical question.
Approved without objection in the Judiciary Committee, no floor debate.
To: 4integrity
It's so important for us to have FACTS to refute the Dims half truths or outright lies. I read someone is sending this to Schumer. I'll send it to Kerry.Don't waste the postage.
They know the facts already. The most important fact they know is which side they are on.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-50 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson