1 posted on
01/08/2003 8:31:12 PM PST by
kattracks
To: kattracks
Great! Can we FINALLY go after these verminous lawyers at the ACLU?
2 posted on
01/08/2003 8:35:50 PM PST by
RandallFlagg
(drooling....)
To: kattracks
The case, which set up a stark clash between the nation's security interests and its citizens' civil liberties,You mean if I join a foreign army, fight against the U.S.,and get captured, then I can't get out on bail??? What's this country coming to?
To: kattracks
Even more outrageous is the fact that we hand out US citizenship to any child born in the US to parents who are only temporarily in this country. I think that children born to non-citizens who are not in this country on immigration visas should be considered as citizens of the parents' country, not the US.
To: kattracks
The New York Times gets its panties in a wad over this decision, but nowhere mentioned the Quiren case from World War II. That case concerned eight Germans who got into the United States from submarines in two groups of four. They had money, weapons, and plans to bomb various American facilities. All were captured and tried before a military tribunal. All objected to that trial. One, named Bruno Haupt, objected that he could not be tried that way, because he was an American citizen, born in Chicago.
The Court rejected all the arguments including Haupt (and one other who claimed but did not establish that he was also an American citizen). The reporters and editors at the Times cannot be so ignorant as to not know about the Quiren decision. Heck, I wrote that case up in a UPI article published almost a year ago, on 28 January, 2002, concerning the Gitmo prisoners (who are also referenced in this article).
The Times cannot plead mere ignorance. This has to be deliberate lying by not mentioning a critical case from 59 years ago, that leads to the same conclusion that this Court of Appeals decision. Just one more example of bias against President Bush by the Times.
The title of my article was "Analysis: The truth on 'Gitmo' prisoners," if anyone cares to look it up.
Congressman Billybob
Click for latest column on UPI, "Three Anti-Endorsements" (Not yet on UPI wire, or FR.)
As the politician formerly known as Al Gore has said, my book, "to Restore Trust in America"
To: kattracks
if deference is not exercised with respect to military judgments in the field, it is difficult to see where deference would ever obtain." Indeed. Wage acts of war and reap the fruits of war!
But Elisa Massimino, a director of the Lawyers Committee for Human Rights, said: "The court seems to be saying that it has no role whatsoever in overseeing the administration's conduct of the war on terrorism.
Too bad, Elisa. You just lost-out on some really big paychecks. And no. You can't play with the big boys.
7 posted on
01/08/2003 8:55:37 PM PST by
GVnana
To: kattracks
Hamdi's lawyers and the entire ACLU belong in the brig for the duration--of their lives.
9 posted on
01/08/2003 9:01:09 PM PST by
PoisedWoman
(Fed up with the liberal media)
To: kattracks
Good. These lousy frickin' traitors deserve no mercy when they side with the enemy. The ACLU cries about how these vermin are treated. We should treat these traitors just like they were treated during the Revolutionary War. The ACLU would be screaming like hogs being butchered.
To: kattracks
First off, If you take up arms against your country, It's TREASON A crime punishable by death. These former citizens should thank their lucky stars I'm not the one who decides their fate. "Old Sparky" would be the only justice they would see
11 posted on
01/08/2003 9:37:13 PM PST by
MJY1288
(A Commander-in-Chief to respect)
To: kattracks
Gold digging trial lawyers have bee handed another green weeny to eat. Ya just gotta love that.
16 posted on
01/09/2003 12:15:51 AM PST by
fella
To: kattracks
There are a couple of things that make me feel a bit queasy about this decision.
First, when do we know this war is over and it's time to revoke the extraordinary powers given to the Executive branch?
And second, I don't want to see these powers in the hands of a President Hillary! Clinton or anyone who thinks and acts as she does.
To: dd5339
ping!
18 posted on
01/09/2003 7:59:25 AM PST by
Vic3O3
To: kattracks
24 posted on
01/09/2003 6:10:14 PM PST by
Bob J
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson