Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Oberon
Reality, however, cares not a whit for appearances. Either something is moving or it isn't, regardless of how it appears in your relative frame of reference. - Southack

"Because you make this assertion, you also implicitly assert that you know it to be true, i.e. you can tell [that something isn't moving]." - Oberon

No, by making that assertation, I am pointing out that Reality doesn't care whether we can "tell" or not.

258 posted on 07/01/2003 11:51:43 AM PDT by Southack (Media bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 256 | View Replies ]


To: Southack
No, by making that assertation, I am pointing out that Reality doesn't care whether we can "tell" or not.

Thus asserting that you've got the goods on "Reality." That's why I referred to praying to you, because if you've really got a lock on Reality, theyn you're God.

Look, I've said some foolish things in the past and later failed to back down from them. In this case, you've done likewise, and no amount of hedging or obfuscatory argument will erase it. I'm going to drop it and go on, because I've got better things to do.

Meanwhile, according to the best theory we have to date:

All motion is relative.

Accept it now; understand it later, if necessary.

261 posted on 07/01/2003 11:57:22 AM PDT by Oberon (What does it take to make government shrink?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 258 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson