To: Pharmboy; justshutupandtakeit
What would the penalty have been?
3 posted on
01/06/2003 11:51:01 AM PST by
hchutch
To: hchutch
Intentional grounding, which marks the ball at the spot of the foul and might still include a 5 second count off inside the two minute warning.
6 posted on
01/06/2003 11:53:16 AM PST by
discostu
To: hchutch
Probably intentional grounding, with a 10 second run off of the clock.
This game absolutely killed me yesterday. The worst Giants loss in my lifetime, worse than Piscarchek, worse than the debacle against Minnesota in 97. Worse than any pasting, blow out, blown lead, divisional loss etc. WORST EVER!
Thank goodness I have 6 months to recover
14 posted on
01/06/2003 11:57:55 AM PST by
amused
To: hchutch
What would the penalty have been?Whatever, plus a 10 second runoff because it would have been an offensive penalty in the final two minutes.
30 posted on
01/06/2003 12:05:26 PM PST by
HIDEK6
To: hchutch; discostu; amused
What would the penalty have been?
Probably intentional groundingIMHO, that'd be a pretty crappy rule...
Oughta just call it a bonehead intentional fumble and let play continue with whoever pounces on the ball getting possession.
To: hchutch
What would the penalty have been?
|
|
Wearing those old Cinncinati Bengals uniforms. |
296 posted on
01/06/2003 3:05:43 PM PST by
Fintan
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson