1 posted on
01/06/2003 9:53:14 AM PST by
MrLeRoy
To: *Wod_list
Wod_list ping
2 posted on
01/06/2003 9:53:33 AM PST by
MrLeRoy
To: MrLeRoy
--Donovan No Runner--
Just Say No?
To: Wolfie; vin-one; WindMinstrel; headsonpikes; philman_36; Beach_Babe; jenny65; AUgrad; Xenalyte; ...
WOD Ping
6 posted on
01/06/2003 10:56:03 AM PST by
jmc813
To: MrLeRoy
But police were concerned that handing the pot over to No Runner would violate a federal law prohibiting the distribution of controlled substances. Right, just like they get real concerned about violating federal weapons laws when the do gun "buy-backs". Give me a break.
8 posted on
01/06/2003 11:03:44 AM PST by
MileHi
To: MrLeRoy
But police were concerned that handing the pot over to No Runner would violate a federal law prohibiting the distribution of controlled substances. Heck, do it the way I get mine, in the back booth at the local Denny's.
9 posted on
01/06/2003 11:51:55 AM PST by
Wolfie
To: Howlin; Ed_NYC; MonroeDNA; widgysoft; Springman; FreedomPoster; Timesink; AntiGuv; ...
You put yer weed in it!
"Hold muh beer 'n watch this!" PING....
If you want on or off this list, please let me know!
17 posted on
01/06/2003 12:14:45 PM PST by
mhking
To: MrLeRoy
Whatever the case is, can you imagine the tension in the PD property office when they handed him his weed and watched him walk away? :-)
They were watching government bonus checks for drug busts, and drug money confiscations diminising too! Oh the horror!
To: MrLeRoy
But police were concerned that handing the pot over to No Runner would violate a federal law prohibiting the distribution of controlled substances. LOL!! They steal something from someone, then try to claim that by giving it back, they would be "distributing" it!? They have no shame.
They dont seem to care about federal law when they are doing "gun buy backs" or setting up sting operations where they sell drugs.....
"The city is an agency of the state, and we're following state law and a court order," Interim City Attorney Gil Trujillo said.
Very good. Give him a cookie!
To: MrLeRoy
How come proposition 215 gets followed in CA meanwhile the same people in California passed 187 and the state ignores the measure regarding the funding illegals out of public monies?
CA is as bonkers and Oregan and a few other states now and then. I expect the FEDS won't bother so much with the fellow who uses pot if he has a real illness and smokes in private IMO.
If he starts to use in public or gives some away or sells some after what happened in court, I expect he will be caught and doing time in the future.
I don't think anyone cares about small use done in the privacy of the home. In CA you get at most a ticket for that, but the law is there to reduce use of the drug.
39 posted on
01/06/2003 12:48:20 PM PST by
A CA Guy
To: MrLeRoy
"The city is an agency of the state, and we're following state law and a court order," Interim City Attorney Gil Trujillo said. I bet you took an oath to the Constitution, Gil. Look it up.
To: MrLeRoy
Donovan No Runner?
It's certainly true that when stoned, one of the last things one feels like doing is running. But changing one's name because of it seems a bit much. He could've just as easily changed it to Donovan No Worker as well. ...Or perhaps something positive ....like Donovan Yes Slacker, or Yes Toker, or Yes Baker, Yes Listener To The Band Yes.
98 posted on
01/06/2003 3:16:06 PM PST by
Mr. Mojo
To: MrLeRoy
Good to see that this guy was given "quarter".
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson