Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

High property values means higher taxes
The Boston Heral ^ | January 5,2003 | Kay Lazar

Posted on 01/05/2003 10:49:43 AM PST by Radix

A collective shriek is echoing across Massachusetts as homeowners in many communities open their latest property tax bills and see their assessed home values soaring 30, 40 and in some cases more than 100 percent, sending their tax bills skyrocketing by hundreds of dollars.

(Excerpt) Read more at 2.bostonherald.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Government; Miscellaneous; US: Massachusetts
KEYWORDS: homes; property; taxes
A collective shriek is echoing across Massachusetts as homeowners in many communities open their latest property tax bills and see their assessed home values soaring 30, 40 and in some cases more than 100 percent, sending their tax bills skyrocketing by hundreds of dollars.

Recession-weary residents are startled by the monster bills that seem out of whack with the tightest fiscal times in more than a decade.

But the 2003 fiscal year tax bills that hit mailboxes in late December reflect the sizzling housing market of 2001 because tax assessors traditionally use housing-market prices from the previous year to measure home values.

Now, lagging tax assessments are finally catching up to the housing boom of the late 1990s, but they are slamming many who are already going bust.

``Many (seniors) are saying they are going to have to sell their homes and move,'' said Pat Carty Larkin, executive director of the Council on Aging in Westwood, where anxious seniors on fixed incomes have been calling about their new sky-high tax bills.

``Others are deciding whether to buy their medicines or pay their taxes. They can't afford both,'' Larkin said.

The upper-middle-income community in Boston's southwest suburbs just completed its triennial property revaluation - the state requires each community to update property values every three years - and Westwood found the average home increased by 40 percent in value during that stretch. Average tax bills shot up by 15 percent.

For Larkin, 58, the latest tax bills hit hard on several fronts.

As a homeowner in the blue-collar MetroWest town of Milford, Larkin just opened a property tax bill that jumped 8 percent.

But it was the tax bill for the summer cottage she and her husband own near Buzzards Bay in Mattapoisett that knocked her off her chair.

``It's a shack, a four-room little house that's not even winterized,'' Larkin said. ``When we purchased it 18 months ago it was assessed at $68,000. Now, it's gone up to $177,000.''

The Larkins' annual tax bill in Mattapoisett nearly doubled, from $1,400 to $2,600.

For the past several years, the state's Department of Revenue has been encouraging local tax assessors to update their property values annually so that a community's residents don't suffer sticker shock from tax bills that haven't been regularly adjusted to reflect real market prices. State figures show an increasing number of local assessors followed that advice as house values and tax bills climbed steadily during the 1990s.

The state's numbers show that the average single-family home jumped 14 percent in value, with a tax bill that increased nearly 7 percent in the last fiscal year. While the state hasn't calculated the average increases for this year, reports coming in from across the commonwealth suggest that the new property values and taxes will leave last year's in the dust.

Consider Somerville. Residents are opening bills that show a nearly 30 percent increase in the value of the average single-family home, and a whopping 25 percent hike in the tax bill. That translates to about $476 more a year.

``I expect a lot of calls because of sticker shock,'' said Richard Brescia, Somerville's chief assessor. ``We have an overlay account of $1.2 million, enough to fund some exemptions for seniors, so they won't have to eat cat food.''

Somerville's property taxes, at $2,335 on the average single-family home, are well below the state's $3,000-plus average. That's because Somerville is one of just 11 communities that offers a sizable ``residential exemption'' discount, knocking $1,339 off the bill for each taxpayer who owns and occupies a house.

Somerville's hefty increases in home values pale in comparison to those in the Cape Cod community of Bourne, which hadn't updated its values in three years.

``Waterfront property, or those with water influences, such as those across the street from the water or a quick walk to the beach, went up over 80 to 110 percent, on average,'' said Donna Barakauskas, the town's new assessor who inherited the unpopular updating task.

``Water properties have been so underassessed for so long, it was catch-up for them,'' Barakauskas said.

Catch-up for those properties, she said, averaged about $1,000 more a year in taxes. Some shot up $2,500.

The latest property tax misery in Massachusetts is similar to woes ricocheting across the country as assessments catch up in all corners.

``There was some shrieking a year ago, but it's a lot louder now,'' said David Brunori, editor of State Tax Notes, a Virginia-based weekly that tracks tax trends.

``Now, with the economy down, the increased property tax burden hurts much more,'' Brunori said. ``People weren't complaining so much in 1999 and 2000 when the economy was roaring, incomes were up and consumer confidence was high.''

Added to the misery in Massachusetts is a lot of confusion, because many homeowners mistakenly believe the state law, known as Proposition 2 1/2 , is supposed to limit a community's total tax increase each year to 2 1/2 percent - unless voters agree to override that.

But the state law also says so-called ``new growth'' - new home construction, additions and renovations - can be exempt from that Proposition 2 1/2 cap.

An explosion of new growth and pricey homes in Needham through 2001 sent tax bills soaring.

``We have two-bedroom, one-bathroom Capes selling for $385,000 to $400,000, and many are being torn down and four- and five-bedroom colonials are built on them,'' said Jim Weidenfeller, Needham's chief assessor. ``It was nothing to see $60,000 to $100,000 kitchen upgrades.''

While Needham's superhot housing market has slowed down a bit, it wasn't in time to save many residents from superinflated tax bills.

``I have a tiny four-room house, one bath, no garage and they raised my quarterly bill from $580 to $1,028. I just can't do it. I have been retired for 20 years and a widow for 30,'' said one Needham senior who asked that her name not be used.

The Needham native said her house value jumped in the latest assessment from $217,000 to $350,000. ``How can a four-room house be worth that much?'' she said. ``Everything has gone through the roof.''

Copyright by the Boston Herald and Herald Interactive Advertising Systems, Inc. No portion of BostonHerald.com or its content may be reproduced without the owner's written permission.Privacy Commitment

1 posted on 01/05/2003 10:49:43 AM PST by Radix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Radix
There are always new ways to increase taxes.

Just tell them they are rich and then tax them more for being so.
2 posted on 01/05/2003 10:52:53 AM PST by Radix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Radix
So, the facts finally come out....property taxes are capital gains tax on uncapitalized gains....
3 posted on 01/05/2003 11:18:24 AM PST by thinking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Radix
The more the GSE's inflate the value of homes, the more access to citizens incomes the GSEs and local governments will have.

Lather,rinse,repeat.

4 posted on 01/05/2003 12:21:27 PM PST by AdamSelene235
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Radix
I've always said - you don't own anything, you just rent it from the government. Don't think so? Just try not paying your taxes, the owner(government) will sell your stuff to get their rent(taxes).
5 posted on 01/05/2003 12:29:59 PM PST by catdaddy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Radix
Just tell them they are rich and then tax them more for being so.

This scam is nothing new. My dad has been fighting city hall off and on for the last thirty years. Some idiot will pay twice what a home is worth in his neighborhood, and he will get a property tax bill that he has to contest every so often. Many people are too stupid to contest the tax bill.

6 posted on 01/05/2003 12:34:58 PM PST by EVO X
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Radix
One of the things that wasn't pointed out is the House market could collapse and the tax evaluation stays the same. The original intent as to tax based on sq footage, I think it time for another referenda.
7 posted on 01/05/2003 12:42:03 PM PST by Little Bill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Radix
In Cali, amazing as it may seem, we are protected by Prop. 13, which limits valuation increases to 2% a year.
8 posted on 01/05/2003 3:49:56 PM PST by TheDon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheDon
I was a charter voter on 13; our property tax was increasing at the rate of $500/year the first 4 years from 1974; after 13 it was rolled back to $1500 where it stayed until we sold in 1984; now I live in Nashville-by-the-dump and my taxes went up almost 40% last year.
9 posted on 01/05/2003 4:23:45 PM PST by Old Professer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Radix
I have property apraised at 2 times the actual selling value in Dallas Co.
10 posted on 01/05/2003 4:30:52 PM PST by dalebert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Radix
Prop 13. Prop 13. Prop 13.
11 posted on 01/05/2003 5:57:34 PM PST by BIGZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BIGZ
On the other hand, one reason that Kalifornia is hosed on their budget is -- their property taxes have not kept up with the rest of the nation. Which by the way is one thing that drove up the property values in that state so much - because of the relatively lower property tax burden.

Now the pigeons come home to roost.

12 posted on 01/05/2003 7:14:22 PM PST by dark_lord
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: dark_lord
On the other hand, one reason that Kalifornia is hosed on their budget is -- their property taxes have not kept up with the rest of the nation. Which by the way is one thing that drove up the property values in that state so much - because of the relatively lower property tax burden.

OH! BS! The Kali state income tax is pro rated up to 9% of income if not more. California is just like many other states, in that they were spending money like drunken sailors during the late 90's and even into the 00's

13 posted on 01/05/2003 8:27:41 PM PST by EVO X
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Black Birch
Perhaps. Here in Illinois it is common to pay more in property tax than income tax. The good thing about that is that the majority of tax goes to local things (park district, school district, water district, fire, police, sanitation, etc.). The problem with income tax is it goes to the state level and they do spend it like drunken sailors.

Overall, I think it better to pay more in property tax than income tax, since with property tax it goes locally. You can go down to the town meeting and look the village board in the eye and discuss just what gets spent where. Much better than having some politically connected bureaucrats 100's of miles away spending your money on pet projects over which you have no perview.

14 posted on 01/06/2003 7:13:14 AM PST by dark_lord
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: dark_lord
Overall, I think it better to pay more in property tax than income tax, since with property tax it goes locally. You can go down to the town meeting and look the village board in the eye and discuss just what gets spent where. Much better than having some politically connected bureaucrats 100's of miles away spending your money on pet projects over which you have no perview.

I see your point I don't like it because little old ladies and people on fixed income can be forced to move because they can't pay substancially higher property taxes. taxes when property values sky rocket.

15 posted on 01/06/2003 4:16:22 PM PST by EVO X
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Black Birch
Illinois handles that by offering a "Senior Property Tax Relief" deal. Seniors age 65 and older get a $2000 to $2500 reduction on their property tax. Additionally, based on income, they can pick up another $700 tax rebate. So for some, that means they pay no property tax at all.

It is perfectly feasible to age and means test the property tax so that seniors living on a limited fixed income are not forced out of their homes by property taxes.

In some cases, the seniors should simply place a larger, high value home on the market, sell it, keep the federal tax exemption, and move into a smaller house.

Either way, seniors don't have to get screwed over this. My point was merely that property taxes are predominantly local - eg. small government - whereas income taxes go to the state level.

16 posted on 01/06/2003 6:58:57 PM PST by dark_lord
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: dark_lord
Illinois handles that by offering a "Senior Property Tax Relief" deal. Seniors age 65 and older get a $2000 to $2500 reduction on their property tax. Additionally, based on income, they can pick up another $700 tax rebate. So for some, that means they pay no property tax at all

Thanks for the info. I'll keep that in mind. I am a renter in Illinois, BTW..

17 posted on 01/07/2003 4:03:18 AM PST by EVO X
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson