Replies

This is just plain silly.

The topic of ""female sexual dysfunction" has been discussed and taught in medical schools for decades and there's many causes. Some drug company just didn't make it up last year!

I think the problem is that this goes against the PC, pro-femist Master & Johnsons report that women's libido increases once they get old enough not to easily concieve and suffer the "burden" of childbirth. (Which is totally ridiculous in the 1st place. Makes no evolutionary sense.)

Women are perfect don't you know. How dare an evil corporation say otherwise!

"Women are perfect don't you know."

Not so, or they would have the same sex drive as men and be satisfied just as easily, every time. Most of them were short changed for whatever the cause. What a shame.

I think the problem is that this goes against the PC, pro-femist Master & Johnsons report that women's libido increases once they get old enough not to easily concieve and suffer the "burden" of childbirth. (Which is totally ridiculous in the 1st place. Makes no evolutionary sense.

Since when did *evolution* make sense. Sorry that's another topic.

It does make emotional sense, for those who think children are a liability rather than a blessing. Which is what the PC crowd bases their arguments on.

Women are perfect don't you know. How dare an evil corporation say otherwise!

So... you're agreeing women aren't perfect, and yet they should alone be responsible for something as critical as "reproductive gatekeeping"?