Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: lizma
I think the problem is that this goes against the PC, pro-femist Master & Johnsons report that women's libido increases once they get old enough not to easily concieve and suffer the "burden" of childbirth. (Which is totally ridiculous in the 1st place. Makes no evolutionary sense.

Since when did *evolution* make sense. Sorry that's another topic.

It does make emotional sense, for those who think children are a liability rather than a blessing. Which is what the PC crowd bases their arguments on.

Women are perfect don't you know. How dare an evil corporation say otherwise!

So... you're agreeing women aren't perfect, and yet they should alone be responsible for something as critical as "reproductive gatekeeping"?

22 posted on 01/03/2003 7:21:43 PM PST by Terriergal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: Terriergal
So... you're agreeing women aren't perfect, and yet they should alone be responsible for something as critical as "reproductive gatekeeping"?

Yep. Of coarse.

Until recently many, many, many, women died in childbirth! A couple hundred years ago what you did after the pub closed could have a 10% chance of you dying later, wouldn't you think twice. Men didn't have the same odds during the same reason.

It's been that way since the dawn of time and to this day more women still die in the "process" then men. (Viagra may change that a tad though.)

It's been just a matter of common sense. (whether from evolution or Adam and Eve, you would desire the best offsprings when you have to risk your life to get one.)

23 posted on 01/03/2003 8:03:12 PM PST by lizma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson