Skip to comments.
Class 3 Senate Seats - the 2004 Senate Elections - Who's Vulnerable?
condensed data from The Green Papers ^
| 1.2.2003
| rface
Posted on 01/02/2003 11:58:19 AM PST by rface
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 next last
I don't have any special inside info, but my picks for possible 'RAT Senate Seat pick-ups are:
(Nevada) Harry Reid
(North Carolina) John Edwards
(North Dakota) Byron Dorgan
(South Carolina) Ernest Hollings
(South Dakota) Tommy Dasshole
(Washington) Patty Murray
any insight into this - something to ponder and pass a slow news day
Ashland, Missouri
1
posted on
01/02/2003 11:58:19 AM PST
by
rface
To: rface
Beating the Moron Patty Murray is a nice dream but Washington is overpopulated with Socialists who will vote for any Candidate that the Democrats run.
To: rface
I like our chances of Giuliani vs. Schumer.
I would worry about Fitzgerald and good old Single Bulls--t Spector.
3
posted on
01/02/2003 12:06:34 PM PST
by
Keith
To: rface
I suspect the reason John Edwards is running for President is that he believes he doesn't stand much of a chance of being re-elected to the Senate.
I would add Barbara Boxer to that list, but only if the GOP can find an attactive candidate. (And there may be one in Orange Co. Sheriff Michael Corona, according to Hugh Hewitt.) California has become the most Democratic state west of Massachusetts, but within two years, the Democrats will have made such a mess of the state budget, there will be a backlash. Plus, Barbara Boxer is one of the THE most shrill leftists in the US Senate -- she's far too extreme left, even for California.
On the GOP list, perhaps the only Republican in trouble could be Peter Fitzgerald.
4
posted on
01/02/2003 12:08:19 PM PST
by
My2Cents
To: My2Cents; rface
Thanks to Frank Murkowski appointing his daughter, the Alaska seat will become in play, with the Republicans as the underdog. The popular former governor (Knowles I think) is running for that seat and apparently the WH wasn't happy with the appointment
5
posted on
01/02/2003 12:20:48 PM PST
by
frmrda
To: The Obstinate Insomniac
yea....but we could pound on Patty and force the 'RATS to pour $$ into that race. 'RATS are gonna hurt for money this go-around and they also have 19 seats to protect.
I say that even to pick off one 'RAT senator would be a great thing
I also know that we can be vulnerable on a couple seats as well - but I still think we can get another seat or two in 2004 - unless disaster falls
6
posted on
01/02/2003 12:24:11 PM PST
by
rface
To: My2Cents
I just think it may hurt Edwards to run in the Pres. Primaries and run for Senate at the same time
7
posted on
01/02/2003 12:28:33 PM PST
by
rface
To: rface
Georgia might be a pickup for Republicans. Zell Miller has said he would only serve one term.
8
posted on
01/02/2003 12:35:14 PM PST
by
xrp
To: rface
Those all look like pretty safe seats on the Rat side, I'm sorry to say. Barbara Boxer is probably the most brainless idiot ever to sit in the Senate and people think she may be vulnerable, but remember, this is liberal Rat bastion Kali and Boxer has the magic talisman (abortion) on her side. Unless the 'Pubs nominate someone who can lay claim to killing more babies than Boxer, I think the Brainless One is in for another term.
We may get either Graham's or Edwards' seat but only if they run for President, and then we might get either of them as President, which would be A Bad Thing. I've heard it said that Edwards is unpopular right now in NC and that may well be, but two years is a long time in politics and he may be able to patch things up if he doesn't go the presidential route. Never overestimate the intelligence of the average voter...
We will probably lose Fitzgerald because of infighting and the fact that IL is trending strongly to the Rat side in recent elections. Is it demographics? I don't know...
We could lose Spector for the same reason, unless he proudly paints himself as a RINO. I think Alaska is OK for the 'Pubs based on environmental issues. I seem to recall a poll showing most Alaskans are pro-oil development in the state. Makes sense, since its a cash cow for them.
9
posted on
01/02/2003 12:40:04 PM PST
by
chimera
To: The Obstinate Insomniac
An earlier posted article today showed the dem/GOP gap in WA getting narrow. Considering the downward spiral in the WA economy, there is a good chance for reversal of past voting trends. A pro-business governor and a pro-American senator could win.
10
posted on
01/02/2003 12:40:21 PM PST
by
meadsjn
To: rface
Keyes vs. Miluski in MD
Guiliani vs. Schumer in NY
Is Nickles retiring? Because its been mentioned that J.C. Watts might run for that seat. Two black republicans in the Senate that currently has none. wouldn't that be a dig at the party whose southern members tried to filibuster civil rights.
Speaking of Dem racists, I want Fritz Hollings to go down in flames sooooooo bad
To: xrp
12
posted on
01/02/2003 12:44:07 PM PST
by
JohnnyZ
To: BaBaStooey
The "two black Republican" senators theme was actually floated earlier today, but with a Voinovich retirement in Ohio, being replaced by Sec. State J. Kenneth Blackwell -- I read, however, that he's been planning to wait and run for governor.
Alan Keyes is my hero (read my profile!) but he's got no shot against Mikulski. Even running another black candidate would have psychological effect in Maryland, however, especially after the GOP elected Michael Steele Lt Governor.
Oh, and lest folks worry that the GOP is joining in the race-pimping, Blackwell, Steele, and JC Watts are all qualified, articulate pro-life conservatives.
13
posted on
01/02/2003 12:51:04 PM PST
by
JohnnyZ
To: rface
If Tommie runs for pres, his seat will go to the GOP. Tommie would probably be tough to beat, but there's no one waiting in the wings behind him.
14
posted on
01/02/2003 12:51:25 PM PST
by
SoDak
To: SoDak
Right now we're looking at five possible open D seats, all in GOP country: Edwards (NC), Graham (FL), Daschle (SD), Miller (GA), Hollings (SC). Edwards is only a narrow favorite to win if he gives up the presidential campaign -- he got far fewer votes in '98 than Bowles did in '02 and now he has a record to run against -- and Hollings is either a tossup or underdog, hopefully against Jim DeMint.
15
posted on
01/02/2003 12:57:11 PM PST
by
JohnnyZ
To: My2Cents
I agree with Boxer being vulnerable for the reasons you outline.
Plus, if Bush's popularity holds in California (so far, so good), his re-election will help down-ticket candidates.
I wouldn't be surprised to see Arnold Schwarzeneggar as her replacement.
16
posted on
01/02/2003 12:57:52 PM PST
by
Dog Gone
To: SoDak
All we need to guarantee continued GOP control are a couple of retirements: Daschle, Hollings, Zell Miller, possibly even Graham of Florida. John Edwards will run for re-election after his presidential candidate collapses. Reid is crazy if he doesn't retire, because newcomers to his state loathe him and cannot wait to vote him out.
17
posted on
01/02/2003 12:58:52 PM PST
by
mwl1
To: JohnnyZ
I agree, Hollings should be scared out of seeking re-election.
18
posted on
01/02/2003 12:59:46 PM PST
by
mwl1
To: mwl1
I think Murray in WA is vulnerable, but only with a credible 'Pub candidate. There are a couple. Jennifer Dunn is one.
19
posted on
01/02/2003 1:00:08 PM PST
by
gogeo
To: Dog Gone
Boxer may be vulnerable, but Bush is going to invest more in New York than in California because of 9-11. This is where Guiliani's candidacy against Chuckie comes in.
20
posted on
01/02/2003 1:00:50 PM PST
by
mwl1
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson