Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: WarrenC
" A tax cut that doesn't include a reduction in top marginal rates is designed to fail and to discredit tax cuts as public policy. Why is this so hard for so many allegedly bright people to understand?

The president and the nation would be better off with no tax cut at all than with one that fails to reduce top marginal rates."

My point about Rush today, was that he was criticizing Bush prematurely-based on supposition from aides and speculation from Reuters.According to the quotes I posted from the Reuters article-no one knows what Bush is going to do,he is being tight lipped and he hasn't signed off on the package. The words "might" and "might not" and "probably" and " expected to" were used throughout the article-which Rush took as "definitely will" or "will not". If Rush wants to take apart Bush's economic stimulus package, perhaps he should wait until the details are actually announced by the President.
201 posted on 01/02/2003 6:37:10 PM PST by Wild Irish Rogue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 197 | View Replies ]


To: Wild Irish Rogue
I understand the point you were making. I was fretting about Bush's aides talking as though a tax cut that doesn't include a cut of the top rate would be nothing to criticize.
221 posted on 01/03/2003 5:36:58 AM PST by WarrenC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 201 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson