Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

You Will Have to Read This to Believe This
The New Criterion ^ | Dec. 4, 2002 | Staff Writer

Posted on 12/29/2002 5:30:02 AM PST by Davis

Meanwhile, at Cornell . . .

While Saint Xavier busies itself with damage control over a history professor who cannot distinguish between protest and pedagogy, Cornell University’s health service is debating the important question of whether to sell vibrators in its dispensary. “Many students,” a college newspaper reports, “feel it would be helpful for Gannett [health center] to have vibrators available because Cornell is located in Ithaca, not a major city.” Somjen Frazer, Cornell ’03, explained the problem: “At this point, you either go online or go downtown to the sort of scary and not very woman-affirming place sex-shop.” Paraphrasing Ms. Frazer, the paper noted that, “as with anything else they sell, the dispensary will give out educational materials explaining how to properly clean a vibrator that two women are going to share and what exactly vibrators can be used for.” Yes, we can see how important that would be. Most, though not all, of the students quoted about the proposed innovation were enthusiastic. Sara Jacobs, Cornell ’05, confided that “I think one of the most important things is for women to be able to get themselves off. It’s better than going to the sketchy shop downtown where they have to check the batteries for you.” Perhaps Cornell will offer an elective on changing batteries. It seems the least they can do for—let’s see, at last count it was $38,254 all in.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: cornell; ithacais; publicmoney; thecityofevil; vibrators
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-39 last
To: hrhdave
The New Criterion magazine, from which this item comes, is a high quality intellectual magazine

Agree. The more important of the two observations from that issue is the following:

Tenured adolescents

For it’s Tommy this, an’ Tommy that, an’ “Chuck him out, the brute!” But it’s “Saviour of ’is country” when the guns begin to shoot; … —Rudyard Kipling, “Tommy” (1890)

We have been reminded of Kipling’s poem “Tommy” a good deal lately. Its most famous line—in which Kipling speaks of “makin’ mock o’ uniforms that guard you while you sleep”—has a special relevance at a moment when anti-war animus is bubbling out of the universities and other protected redoubts of politically correct sentiment. Living in the aftermath of the 1960s and its culture of protest, most of us have long been inured to the spectacle of privileged adolescents attacking the institutions that guarantee their privileges. We have been inured as well to the spectacle of privileged men and women, middle-aged and older, behaving like those spoiled adolescents. It is only business as usual when a tenured professor rails against capitalism, “the corporations,” or the United States military, even though those institutions secure his livelihood and, ultimately, make his tenure possible.

There is, as we say, nothing new in this spectacle. By now, many of us have come to expect professors and indeed the cultural elite generally to act like spoiled adolescents. Often—not always, not everywhere, but frequently—there seems to be an inverse relationship between virtues like patriotism and common sense and the number of years spent at a university or similarly insulated cultural institution (a museum, say, or The New York Times, PBS, most major TV news networks …). To a large extent, it comes under the capacious category of what Lionel Trilling called “the adversary culture of the intellectuals”—which is to say that, like so much in life, it is disappointing but not surprising.

Well, not usually surprising. Every now and then, however, the animating virulence of this phenomenon shows itself naked, without premeditation, politesse, or the other emollients that civil exchange imposes. And when this happens the result remains no less surprising than disturbing. What we have in mind is a recent exchange between a cadet at the United States Air Force Academy and Peter N. Kirstein, a tenured professor of history at Saint Xavier University in Chicago. At the end of October, the unnamed cadet sent out an email to numerous academics soliciting their participation in a sort of symposium on the theme of “America’s Challenges in an Unstable World: Balancing Security with Liberty.” Here, in part, is what the cadet wrote:

Dear Sir or Ma’am, The Air Force Academy is going to be having our annual Academy Assembly. This is a forum for mainly but not only Political Science majors, discussing very important issues dealing with politics. Right now we are in the planning stage for advertising and we would appreciate your help in the follow areas. Do you know of or have any methods or ways for interschool advertising and or communications? What would be the best way for us to advertise at your school whether it is sending you the fliers and you making copies or by perhaps putting an advertisement in your local publication? We would appreciate your input and the cost of what you recommend. Thank you for your time and consideration.

Standard-issue fare, no? We’re having a conference; we’d like to spread the word; do you have any suggestions? Here is what Professor Kirstein wrote in response:

You are a disgrace to this country and I am furious you would even think I would support you and your aggressive baby killing tactics of collateral damage. Help you recruit. Who, top guns to reign [sic] death and destruction upon nonwhite peoples throughout the world? Are you serious sir? Resign your commission and serve your country with honour.

No war, no air force cowards who bomb countries without AAA, without possibility of retaliation. You are worse than the snipers. You are imperialists who are turning the whole damn world against us. September 11 can be blamed in part for what you and your cohorts have done to the Palestinians, the VC, the Serbs, a retreating army at Basra.

You are unworthy of my support.

Rather takes your breath away, doesn’t it?

If you have any doubts about the value of the Internet, consider this: no sooner had Professor Kirstein sent his reply than some public-spirited chap broadcast the exchange by email. It quickly made the rounds—we first heard of it early in November when a friend in Chicago sent us the exchange—and instantly sparked condign outrage. Saint Xavier was flooded with emails, letters, and telephone call from angry cadets, parents, and other concerned citizens. As of mid-November, the front page of the university’s web site carried a hand-wringing apology by Richard A. Yanikoski, the president, informing readers that Saint Xavier was reaching out “compassionately to the large number of men and women who somehow received copies of Professor Kirstein’s e-mail and thereby came to feel demeaned by his intemperate criticisms.” Earth to President Yanikoski: compassion is neither here nor there in this case; there is no “somehow” about how the large number of men and women got that email: it was quickly circulated by people who were outraged by Professor Kirstein’s diatribe; and those people were not “demeaned,” they were angry: there is a difference.

President Yanikoski seemed surprised that “by far the topic of greatest interest to most people has been the University’s response to Professor Kirstein.” Imagine that! The good news is that he has been “relieved of his teaching responsibilities for the current semester and reassigned to other duties” and that an administrative reprimand will be placed in his file. It’s a start. But a look at Professor Kirstein’s college webpage (http://www.sxu.edu/history/pkirstein) shows that it is unlikely to make much difference. Professor Kirstein publishes his own apology there, which begins:

Again I would like to apologize to all who are offended, burdened, distracted and hurt by my e-mail to an Air Force Academy cadet. My e-mail, while motivated from a pacifist perspective, was not professional in tone and totally at variance with my usual interaction with students and colleagues.

Of course it is good to know that the tone of Professor Kirstein’s missive is “totally at variance” with his usual interaction with students and colleagues. But what should we think of the fact that it was “motivated from [sic] a pacifist perspective”? What does that tells us about “the pacifist perspective”? And although many people were “offended,” and rightly offended, by Professor Kirstein’s email, where does being “burdened, distracted and hurt” come into the picture? It belongs in the heap of psychobabble with the President’s compassion. Professor Kirstein’s web page lists his teaching interests, which include “Recent U.S. History,” “The Nuclear Age,” “Vietnam,” “Cold War,” and “National Security Policy.” Any bets as to the content of his courses on those subjects? His web page also carries an eleven-item list elaborating his “teaching philosophy.” The first item, in bold face, declares, “Teaching is a moral act.” Gosh. Professor Kirstein also goes on to tell us that he seeks to “teach peace, freedom, diversity, multiculturalism and challenge American unilateralism.” (How does one teach peace, freedom, etc.? Even if possible, is that what a professor of history is paid to do?) But this list also show that Professor Kirstein is a bit of a comedian: item three announces that he endeavors to “move beyond the ideological confines of academe.” In fact, as Professor Kirstein’s email demonstrates, he embodies the ideological confines of the academy.

Apologies are all well and good. But they are pointless without contrition, and genuine contrition requires a recognition of what one did wrong. Does Professor Kirstein understand what he did wrong? We wonder. In his gracious response to Professor Kirstein’s apology, Captain Jim Borders of the Air Force Academy noted that a situation that began with intemperate rhetoric had ended civilly. He was clearly pleased that almost all of the responses his cadets proposed to Professor Kirstein’s email were “marked by great maturity and professionalism.” The response that best encapsulated the opinion of the cadet wing, he said, came from a textbook they use:

It is the soldier, not the reporter, who has given us the freedom of the press. It is the soldier, not the poet, who has given us the freedom of speech. It is the soldier, not the campus organizer, who gives us the freedom to demonstrate. It is the soldier who salutes the flag, who serves beneath the flag, and whose coffin is draped by the flag, who allows the protester to burn the flag. Sage words, those. We wonder if Professor Kirstein understands them.

21 posted on 12/29/2002 6:34:30 AM PST by Archangelsk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: listenhillary
Today's college students scare me.

Me too!

Was it here on FR, or some place else on the net that, I read an article about a general achievement test where todays collegs grads scored acturally lower than the senior high school grads in 1955.

22 posted on 12/29/2002 6:47:00 AM PST by chainsaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Davis
Bump for reply number 21.
23 posted on 12/29/2002 6:52:55 AM PST by Rocky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hrhdave
I sure do miss the good old days when masturbation was considered something people didn't brag about.
24 posted on 12/29/2002 6:56:46 AM PST by Slyfox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Slyfox
do a google search for "Female hysteria"
25 posted on 12/29/2002 7:47:12 AM PST by listenhillary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: listenhillary
Do I really want to do that?
26 posted on 12/29/2002 7:48:08 AM PST by Slyfox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: listenhillary
I guess I was referring to "polite" society.
27 posted on 12/29/2002 7:51:34 AM PST by Slyfox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Davis
Bump
28 posted on 12/29/2002 7:53:18 AM PST by Fiddlstix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Slyfox
I agree witchoo, pal. There was a time before a fatuous Surgeon General Joycelin Elders and the weenie who appointed her, W.J. Clinton, he of the hairy palms, the late-night one-handed phone correspondent of Monica the Cigar Girl, when we knew enough to be discreet.

For a different view on sex education, take a gander at

http://www.atrentino.com/ColumbusProblem.html
29 posted on 12/29/2002 7:58:34 AM PST by hrhdave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: hrhdave
...and should anyone wonder why SAT math scores in the inner city schools usually tops out at 370. On second thought, the verbal scores sometimes hit 392, so, maybe they ARE learning something in sex ed.
30 posted on 12/29/2002 8:15:43 AM PST by Slyfox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Davis
Why the need for a battery, real women use vibrators with a kick starter.
31 posted on 12/29/2002 9:16:19 AM PST by BIGZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: listenhillary
College kids scare me"

Yes! they do scare us all, imagine paying $20,000 or more per semester and all the kid has to show for it is a 'Vibrator'..... I guess lessons on how to use will cost them another couple thousand...Oh! Woe! what a mess we are in.

32 posted on 12/29/2002 2:17:12 PM PST by ejo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Davis
It’s better than going to the sketchy shop downtown where they have to check the batteries for you.”

You're safe honey if all they are checking are the batteries. Then again, if she's too stupid to do that herself, she's probably not safe anywhere!

33 posted on 12/29/2002 2:22:53 PM PST by StriperSniper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Davis
Are the women at Cornell that incompetent that they can't even figure out how to ... (never mind - censored.)
34 posted on 12/29/2002 5:11:52 PM PST by valkyrieanne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Archangelsk
You're quite right, friend. New Criterion magazine, Hilton Kramer's brainchild, now in its twenty-first year,--a long time for an intellectual magazine--is well worth reading and pondering, and the more important of the two brief articles in the December, 2002, issue, is the one you posted on this thread. (But the Cornell/vibrator item is important and amusing, too.)

Magazines such as New Criterion are the intellectual bulwark against corrupt academe just as FR and the Internet are bulwarks against corrupt media.
35 posted on 01/02/2003 10:02:19 AM PST by hrhdave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Davis
If this the "cream of the crop" (no pun) of our college students then I'll pray that fertility problems skyrocket in the coming decades. Who bred these idiots?
36 posted on 01/02/2003 10:21:39 AM PST by ladywolf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Davis
PS. Ladies, ladies! Cornell has a great veterinary school. Dogs don't need batteries...
37 posted on 01/02/2003 10:27:04 AM PST by ladywolf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ladywolf
To be fair, I hope they are providing inflatable dolls at the clinic for Cornell's men.
38 posted on 01/02/2003 10:32:39 AM PST by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Davis
Ithaca is the City of Evil.


39 posted on 02/24/2003 9:12:40 AM PST by Behind Liberal Lines
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-39 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson