Judge Reinhardt...is he senile, or is he a Communist?
1 posted on
12/28/2002 3:29:08 PM PST by
vannrox
To: vannrox
Gun-rights confusionI'm not confused about MY RIGHTS, why are they? (ok, sarcasm off!)
2 posted on
12/28/2002 3:35:55 PM PST by
BILL_C
To: vannrox
MOLON LABE!!!!!!
3 posted on
12/28/2002 3:39:14 PM PST by
Sparta
To: vannrox
This must be a hoax. This can't be a California paper.
5 posted on
12/28/2002 3:45:44 PM PST by
TC Rider
To: *bang_list
bang!
7 posted on
12/28/2002 3:50:53 PM PST by
coloradan
To: vannrox
Senile Communist.
8 posted on
12/28/2002 3:53:39 PM PST by
Taxman
To: vannrox
Last year the Fifth Circuit, in United States v. Emerson, came to the opposite view, concluding, on the basis of the language of the amendment and the philosophies of the founders, that the Second Amendment does confer an individual right to bear arms While the Fifth Circuit Court's opinion is better than the Ninth's, We (the People) should always keep in mind that nothing in the Bill of Rights confers a right, but rather protects God-given rights by limiting government's power to encroach upon them.
My guess is that Reinhardt is a commie.
To: vannrox; Travis McGee; maica
Travis McGee had posted this recently......
"A well educated citizenry being neccesary to the survival of a free nation, the right of the people to keep and read books shall not be infringed."
Use this example on liberal gun grabbers, and ask them how this can be used to mean that only properly qualified universities and schools and other goverment authorized educators should be allowed the "collective right" to own or read books.
Stay Safe ..........needed repeating Travis :o)
10 posted on
12/28/2002 4:00:26 PM PST by
Squantos
To: vannrox
Judge Reinhardt...is he senile, or is he a Communist? Yes, he is.
14 posted on
12/28/2002 4:15:49 PM PST by
arthurus
To: vannrox
"Judge Reinhardt...is he senile, or is he a Communist?"I'd say he's both.
To: vannrox
"Judge Reinhardt...is he senile, or is he a Communist? "He's a Californian, so anything else is redundant! (With apologies to all Left Coast Freepers)
Regards, Lenny
To: vannrox
Whether the court has the political courage and intellectual integrity to do so properly may be in question. Yes, it is. They have been dodging the issue for 40 years.
26 posted on
12/28/2002 10:03:49 PM PST by
Hugin
To: vannrox
Erudite? He claims in his ruling that the individual rights view has "never been adopted by any court," when in fact there are dozens of state court cases to that effect, and dicta in a number of Supreme Court cases that indicate an individual rights view.
Erudidiot, is more like it.
29 posted on
12/29/2002 1:38:35 AM PST by
mvpel
To: vannrox
I always thought the right to bear arms was closely related to the most basic human right which is the right to control one's own self. It is also related to the right to life.
The idea that one cedes the ability to protect their own person to some other entity or government agency is just plain awful and unamerican.
It is the very opposity of personal freedom and responsibility.
34 posted on
12/29/2002 4:52:28 PM PST by
yarddog
To: vannrox
Religion, taxes, firearms: Today's topics from yesterday's revolution.
35 posted on
12/29/2002 4:57:47 PM PST by
Scruffy
To: vannrox
I think commie is very close to a good, working definition.
36 posted on
12/29/2002 5:01:14 PM PST by
Jhoffa_
To: vannrox
Simply put: BOTH!!!!!
To: vannrox
BTTT
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson