Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Federal appeals panel puts religious-tea ruling on hold
freedom forum ^ | 12.27.02 | The Associated Press

Posted on 12/27/2002 8:50:09 AM PST by freepatriot32

DENVER — The 10th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has blocked a lower court’s ruling that would have returned a barrel of hallucinogenic tea to a New Mexico group that uses the tea for religious purposes.

The appeals court’s decision, announced Dec. 23, granted the federal government’s request to put on hold a Nov. 13 order prohibiting enforcement of drug laws in the case.

An American branch of a Brazilian religious group argued that enforcement of the law violated its rights under the federal Religious Freedom Restoration Act. The Santa Fe, N.M.-based group called O Centro Espirita Beneficiente Uniao do Vegetal uses tea containing dimethyltryptamine, a strong hallucinogen and a controlled substance.

Members say the tea is used only during religious ceremonies and banning it violates their constitutional right to practice their religion.

The tea is brewed from plants found only in the Amazon River Basin.

U.S. District Judge James Parker in New Mexico agreed the group’s rights under RFRA were violated and said members should get back a shipment of tea seized in 1999 by U.S. Customs agents. Parker said the government failed to prove the tea was dangerous.

Parker’s Nov. 13 ruling granting the group’s request for a preliminary injunction formalized an opinion he issued in August.

The appeals court sided with the Justice Department, which argued its right to enforce drug laws for the public good should prevail. A stay of the district court’s ruling will merely maintain the status quo, a two-judge panel of the court wrote.

The court said it also heeded the federal government’s warning that the lower court’s ruling would interfere with international treaties on drugs.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; US: Colorado; US: New Mexico
KEYWORDS: appeals; court; drug; hallucinogenic; laws; religion; tea; wodlist

1 posted on 12/27/2002 8:50:09 AM PST by freepatriot32
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: freepatriot32
This is where it gets tricky. If alcohol is allowed at communion, even for children, why aren't these folks allowed their tea?

This is ripe for abuse of course. Any group could say any drug is part of their worship service, but it appears that this specific tea is from the specific region where the faith originated. They aren't attempting to grow shrooms, drop acid, or smoke dope, or drink communion wine for that matter.

2 posted on 12/27/2002 8:54:06 AM PST by dogbyte12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freepatriot32
When my wife and I were in the Amazon, we visited a village of the Ashuar tribe. A few members of our group tried ayahuasca, a bitter, rust-colored tea which contains DMT.

Gave them a headache.

3 posted on 12/27/2002 9:34:01 AM PST by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freepatriot32
The Santa Fe, N.M.-based group...

That explains a lot right there. There's a reason why I wont even set foot in that town anymore.

4 posted on 12/27/2002 10:07:58 AM PST by CougarGA7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dogbyte12
Prohibition made a specific exemption for the use of alcohol at religion ceremonies. I need to research this subject some more, but as I understand the law to be, Congress can ban or exempt any practice they want, even if this conflicts with one's personal religious beliefs.

Such a law only becomes unconstitutional if the the law was passed with the legislative intent to favor or disfavor a particular religion.

5 posted on 12/27/2002 10:37:07 AM PST by Maximum Leader
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: *Wod_list
http://www.freerepublic.com/perl/bump-list
6 posted on 12/27/2002 1:08:48 PM PST by Libertarianize the GOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson