Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

White House: Web Security Plan Won't Invade Privacy
Reuters via Lycos.com ^ | 12/20/2002 | Andy Sullivan

Posted on 12/20/2002 2:12:16 PM PST by GeneD

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Efforts to bolster Internet security will not lead to increased government scrutiny of individuals' online habits, the White House and industry sources said on Friday.

As it finalizes sweeping guidelines that aim to increase cybersecurity, the Bush administration said individual privacy would not be affected by efforts to prevent cyberattacks.

"The administration is not considering a proposal to monitor what individuals do on the Internet," a spokesman for the Department of Homeland Security said.

High-tech companies, meanwhile, said they would resist government efforts to get involved in the day-to-day operation of the global computer network.

In a set of preliminary guidelines released in September, the White House said high-tech companies that keep an eye on the Internet should combine their efforts and work with the government to better defend against computer viruses, worms and other cyberattacks.

The New York Times in its Friday edition reported the White House is planning a bigger government role in the proposed center that could possibly lead to surveillance of individual users.

But high-tech sources who had been briefed on the updated plans said they were not aware of any such change, and White House Cybersecurity czar Richard Clarke assured high-tech firms the government only wanted them to set up an "early warning system" to keep an eye on the health of the Internet

"This early warning system would, if companies chose to create it, involve only highly aggregated information on the overall health of the Internet," Clarke said in a letter.

CAN'T READ E-MAILS

Internet infrastructure firms such as AT&T Corp. and VeriSign Inc. already maintain such "network operating centers" on their own, keeping an eye out for unusual spikes in traffic that may signal a "denial of service" attack similar to ones that have temporarily disabled high-profile sites like Yahoo! and the White House.

But such centers cannot open e-mails or otherwise monitor content, industry experts say; the system could not be used to ferret out members of al Qaeda or other militant groups.

The head of a high-tech trade group said government involvement in this system is not needed as these companies are already in constant communication with each other.

"They already do it just fine, they don't need government help," said Harris Miller, president of the Information Technology Association of America. "There are so many people monitoring the system that nothing's going to fall through the cracks."

The system may be more like highway traffic cameras that watch for accidents rather than individual police stops, but government involvement is still worrisome, said Stewart Baker, former general counsel to the National Security Agency, who now represents Internet service providers.

"Even if they're only able to do the sorts of searches you'd expect a network operating center to be able to do, it still raises these questions," Baker said. "When do they leave the room?"

Internet service providers -- which do handle individual communications -- are not likely to cooperate with government surveillance efforts unless commanded by court order, an industry source said, because it would discourage people from using the Internet.

A spokesman for America Online said the company had not seen the revised guidelines and thus could not comment, but said the popular access provider would work to balance privacy with security.

Privacy experts said they were not familiar with the revised version of the security plan, which is expected to be released early next year.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Technical
KEYWORDS: americaonline; computersecurityin; georgewbush; internet; security; verisign; yahoo

1 posted on 12/20/2002 2:12:16 PM PST by GeneD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: GeneD
"The administration is not considering a proposal to monitor what individuals do on the Internet," a spokesman for the Department of Homeland Security said.

There's a whole lotta wiggle room in that statement. "Well, we never considered it, but when we implemented the systems, whoops, it just happened..."

2 posted on 12/20/2002 2:15:58 PM PST by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeneD
Efforts to bolster Internet security will not lead to increased government scrutiny of individuals' online habits, the White House and industry sources said on Friday.

Well that settles it for me. I believe the Feds. I trust the Feds. Anybody seen my Kool-Aid?

3 posted on 12/20/2002 2:16:59 PM PST by TomServo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy
"Well, we never considered it, but when we implemented the systems, whoops, it just happened..."

LOL!!! 'Bout sums it up.

4 posted on 12/20/2002 2:18:00 PM PST by TomServo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: *Computer Security In
http://www.freerepublic.com/perl/bump-list
5 posted on 12/20/2002 2:26:40 PM PST by Libertarianize the GOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: GeneD
The sooner we stop trying to protect the anonymity of the whole of each and every Internet protocol, the sooner we can focus on protecting the parts that really matter. Many Internet related activities have always been closely monitored. Many companies have network packet sniffers to see who access what IP address. Google and other ISPs have filters in place to block content to China or other domains under private arrangements. Sites put cookies on your browser all the time, including the FreeRepublic. Some sites capture each and every click and the position of your mouse in order to determine your preferences. NNTP isn't unregulated either. Try looking for kiddie porn newsgroups and say to yourself "nobody will know". People do know; have known for some time. That is why anonymizer sites, which disguise your origin, do business. That is why the Al-Qaeda use Hotmail from an Internet cafe.

There are snoops everywhere on the web. The only protection from discovery has simply been the sheer volume of traffic on all the protocols.

But there is one or two protcols in which everyone has a reasonable expectation of privacy: personal e-mail and FTP; and we should concentrate on protecting it. It should have the same privacy status as snail mail. Now governments are not above steaming open envelopes, but we can encrypt emails and files more easily than notes on a sheet of paper. Yet how many of us, who profess to care about our privacy, encrypt our email. Too inconvenient? For most. But if there is one citadel we shoud defend, that is it.
6 posted on 12/20/2002 2:42:43 PM PST by wretchard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeneD
So then, the government won't have any problem with people sending highly-encrypted email, will it?
7 posted on 12/20/2002 2:43:36 PM PST by Grut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy
White House: Web Security Plan Won't Invade Privacy

http://users.chartertn.net/tonytemplin/fbi_eyes/
8 posted on 12/20/2002 2:45:48 PM PST by Bluntpoint
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: GeneD
If the Whitehouse says they wont snoop, whats the harm, right? Long as George says he wont, thats good enough for any pilgrim. Right?
9 posted on 12/20/2002 2:47:59 PM PST by cynicom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson