Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. kicks off Taiwan submarine competition
Reuters ^

Posted on 12/19/2002 1:01:58 PM PST by Citizen of the Savage Nation

U.S. kicks off Taiwan submarine competition Wednesday December 18, 6:47 pm ET By Jim Wolf

WASHINGTON, Dec 18 (Reuters) - The U.S. Navy on Wednesday kicked off a potential $4.5 billion competition to help Taiwan buy up to eight conventional submarines, despite strong opposition from China.

ADVERTISEMENT The Naval Sea Systems Command, which designs, builds and acquires ships for the U.S. Navy, outlined its plans for the diesel-electric submarines at a two-day session attended by four top U.S. defense contractors.

The briefing for industry wound up Wednesday. The competition will be limited to General Dynamics Corp. (NYSE:GD - News), Northrop Grumman Corp. (NYSE:NOC - News), Raytheon Co. (NYSE:RTN - News) and Lockheed Martin Corp. (NYSE:LMT - News), the government said on its Federal Business Opportunities Web site.

President Bush approved Taiwan's request for the submarines in April 2001 as the centerpiece of the biggest package of proposed arms sales to the island in a decade. The Navy would transfer them under the U.S. Foreign Military Sales program, which is used for government-to-government weapons sales.

The Navy said it wanted construction to begin by 2006, based on funding of a design it hoped to pick by 2004 or 2005, people familiar with the presentation said.

The Navy's International Program Office said it planned to help Taiwan develop a "realistic budget" for the craft, which the non-partisan U.S. Congressional Research Service has estimated could cost $4.5 billion.

Supplying such submarines is extremely complex, fraught with military, diplomatic and technology-transfer implications. It involves the military balance between Taiwan and the mainland. Beijing has threatened to use force to return Taiwan to the fold if the island declares formal independence or drags its feet in unification talks.

The United States has not manufactured diesel submarines for nearly 50 years since the Navy, prodded by Admiral Hyman Rickover, opted to rely exclusively on nuclear-fueled submarines.

The world's biggest exporters of diesel submariners -- Germany and the Netherlands -- have ruled out building submarines or licensing designs that would go to Taiwan. They are unwilling to anger China, which regards Taiwan as a renegade province.

[But yet the Germans seem very willing to anger the US - Citizen]

People familiar with the Navy's thinking described the procurement strategy as based on using an existing design. One possibility under consideration by at least some of the contractors was based on the 1,925-ton Dolphin class submarines built in German shipyards for the Israeli Navy and delivered in 1997.

Another possibility could involve the hiring of experts from the Netherlands' Rotterdamse Droogdok Maatschappij, which sold its Zwaardvis-class submarine design to Taiwan in the 1980s for two Hai Lung (Sea Dragon)-class submarines, a European expert said.

Among those invited to the Navy's briefing on the submarine project, in addition to the four companies in the running, were "known contractors possessing modern diesel electric submarine designs currently in use or under construction for use in navy arsenals," a Dec. 9 announcement on the federal business opportunities Web site said.

At the session, the Navy said it was seeking a logistics approach that maximized self-sufficiency in maintenance and doled out much of the work to Taiwan's China Shipbuilding Corp.

Frank Carlucci, a former U.S. defense secretary who is the outgoing chairman of the U.S. Taiwan Business Council, a private group, said the Taiwan authorities seemed determined to buy the submarines.

"I think it's a budget question," he told reporters at a briefing at which he had been due to introduce his succcessor, another former U.S. defense secretary, William Cohen. Cohen did not participate.

The submarine contract is likely to figure prominently at a U.S.-Taiwan defense conference to be held Feb. 12-14 in San Antonio, Texas, the second in an annual series organized by the business council.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: china; dieselsubmarines; taiwan
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last
Okay, folks, this should be interesting. We haven't built these things for decades, but Europe is too cowardly to make money selling weapons to Taiwan. Must not be as much in it as selling weapons to Saddam, I guess.
1 posted on 12/19/2002 1:01:58 PM PST by Citizen of the Savage Nation
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: knighthawk
Ping. I don't know how to do ping lists, though.
2 posted on 12/19/2002 1:04:04 PM PST by Citizen of the Savage Nation
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Citizen of the Savage Nation
With the rapid improvement in fuel cell development, the Taiwan Navy may end up with some really wiz-bang subs.
3 posted on 12/19/2002 1:12:02 PM PST by sonofatpatcher2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sonofatpatcher2
With the rapid improvement in fuel cell development, the Taiwan Navy may end up with some really wiz-bang subs.

Americans getting back into the diesel sub business are going to make a LOT of foreign subs look like clunkers.

4 posted on 12/19/2002 1:14:20 PM PST by Centurion2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Centurion2000
Re: Americans getting back into the diesel sub business are going to make a LOT of foreign subs look like clunkers.

You make have something there, old sport...

5 posted on 12/19/2002 1:18:15 PM PST by sonofatpatcher2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Citizen of the Savage Nation
ping for later.
6 posted on 12/19/2002 1:26:49 PM PST by HighRoadToChina
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HighRoadToChina
They need these:

The development of the Type 212 will allow the German navy to support the requirements of NATO. The new submarines differ in principle from the conventional, classical submarines of German development. The size alone amounts to with approximately 1830 tons displacement, more than the three-fold greater than the existing conventional submarines.

The outstanding feature of this new type of submarine is its air-independent propulsion system using a silent hydrogen/oxygen fuel cell system which not only makes the submarine more difficult to detect, but also increases the time it can stay submerged. The class 212 submarine is the first in the world to be equipped with this rovolutionary propulsion system. Its performance has already been successfully tested on a German Navy submarine.

Its hybrid diesel-electric and air-independent fuel-cell propulsion system will meet the vital requirement for low detectability. A noiseless propeller will be driven by a low-noise, high-performance, permanent-magnet motor. The reactants for the fuel cell (hydrogen and oxygen) will be stored in the after part of the boat between the pressure hull and an outer, free-flooding hull. The detection-probability requirement will be met also by reducing the boat's acoustic, magnetic, radar, and visual signatures and by minimizing the sonar target strength (against active detection) and sonar target level (against passive detection). The pressure hull, made of high-strength nonmagnetic steel, is optimized for hydrodynamic properties and maneuverability.

For military applications, the advantages of an extremely quiet power source confer great tactical benefits and the current disadvantages of relatively low output compared to its size and weight mean that the first large units are in underwater systems. The latest additions to the German shipbuilder HDW's highly successful Type 209 family of submarines, the Type 212 (ordered by Germany and Italy), the Type 214 (ordered by Greece), and the Type 800, are all fuel cell powered. A submarine that uses fuel cells rather than a diesel engine to recharge its batteries produces much less sound while doing so, and consequently the effective detection range of many of the current passive acoustic sonobuoys is reduced.

7 posted on 12/19/2002 1:38:11 PM PST by spokeshave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Centurion2000
Particularly because our sonar and computer tracking systems blow the competition out of the water (pun not intended at first, but left in for continuity's sake.)
8 posted on 12/19/2002 1:39:36 PM PST by jjm2111
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Citizen of the Savage Nation
but Europe is too cowardly to make money selling weapons to Taiwan.

Thank Goodness for the Euroweenies.
Heaven knows we can't rely on Rumsfeld to keep our shipyards afloat.

9 posted on 12/19/2002 1:43:02 PM PST by Willie Green
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Citizen of the Savage Nation
Must not be as much in it as selling weapons to Saddam, I guess.

Yep, what is the big freaking deal with those Euros, getting hyped up about weapons going to Taiwan and ISrael, but selling deathwares to all the thugs around them... they must be surrendering again. Europe has no heart, what is left there is what ware they have, that is why they behave that way. Still, we have feelings too.

10 posted on 12/19/2002 1:48:32 PM PST by lavaroise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green
Heaven knows we can't rely on Rumsfeld to keep our shipyards afloat.

Rummy worries me too. Dont like nukes, dont like rockets, dont like subs, all these important stuff...

11 posted on 12/19/2002 1:49:53 PM PST by lavaroise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: OldDominion
FYI -- would be a nice chunk of business for the hometown folks at NG/NNS.
12 posted on 12/19/2002 1:55:23 PM PST by Al B.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VaBthang4
ping!!!
13 posted on 12/19/2002 2:15:27 PM PST by Sparta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Citizen of the Savage Nation
"Must not be as much in it as selling weapons to Saddam, I guess."
Supplying a pathological maniac with weapons is, in their eyes, better than having the xenophobic, misanthropic, bigoted(They believe that they are racially superior), AND pathological Chinese aim their nukes at you.
14 posted on 12/19/2002 2:23:11 PM PST by Darksheare
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lavaroise
Its not Rummy. Its GWB and his obeisance to Colin Powell's State Dept. and apparently some demented delusions that GWB has of his own vis-a-vis U.S. nuclear deterrent forces and defense spending that should worry you.

It would never occur to Rummy to do anything to weaken the U.S. in ANY industrial or military sector. But he will follow orders. I don't know at what point he would resign over idiotic orders, but we apparently haven't seen sufficiently idiotic orders yet for him to pull out of the Administration.

15 posted on 12/19/2002 2:38:25 PM PST by Paul Ross
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: spokeshave
The German 209 is a small sub, but there are conventuional subs with a displacement of more than 1830 tons.
The Russian Kilo (887K and 963) is about 3000 tons as is the Tango.

The Japanese have similarly large subs.
16 posted on 12/19/2002 4:45:11 PM PST by rmlew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Citizen of the Savage Nation
The Navy regrets retiring its diesels. They're quieter, which is critical for Special Ops work. This could be a cheap way to get some.
17 posted on 12/19/2002 7:03:16 PM PST by Man of the Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Citizen of the Savage Nation

How about some Kilos? You could probably buy the entire Ukrainian navy for $5 Billion.

18 posted on 12/19/2002 7:14:32 PM PST by struwwelpeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: struwwelpeter
I believe that is China's plan.
Just remember that the Christmas ornament, which you buy at Walmart are made by christians in slave labour camps, funds the PLA-N acquisition of subs.
19 posted on 12/19/2002 10:17:14 PM PST by rmlew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: belmont_mark
PING!
20 posted on 12/19/2002 10:53:44 PM PST by Orion78
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson