Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: dirtboy
And that had the rest of America followed their lead (in the Presidential election of 1948) we wouldn't have had "all these problems."

OK, how do YOU interpret these remarks.

To tell you the truth, I took "all these problems" to mean the problems with terrorism. I never saw any way to connect that to black people, and the belief that Lott was endorsing segregation still seems to me to be an unsupportable stretch. (But don't get me wrong: under any circumstances it was a moronic comment.)

Whether I'm right or not, Lott could probably have deflected this by unloading both indignant barrels in response, but instead he opted for the Jimmy Swaggart option, pleading guilty to the charge. At that point, his fate was sealed. There's no defending a man who won't defend himself.

77 posted on 12/18/2002 10:27:19 AM PST by Physicist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


To: Physicist
Whether I'm right or not, Lott could probably have deflected this by unloading both indignant barrels in response, but instead he opted for the Jimmy Swaggart option, pleading guilty to the charge.

Actually, he first tried to say he meant Strom's 1948 Dixiecrat positions on defense and the budget - even though the Dixiecrat platform didn't even mention those issues. So IMO that is the key point - he basically lied to defend his remarks.

90 posted on 12/18/2002 10:29:54 AM PST by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson