Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Lott complains about White House leaks in connection with controversy over racial remarks
Associated Press

Posted on 12/18/2002 9:58:16 AM PST by RCW2001

JESSE J. HOLLAND, Associated Press Writer
Wednesday, December 18, 2002
©2002 Associated Press

URL: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/news/archive/2002/12/18/national1216EST0589.DTL

(12-18) 09:35 PST WASHINGTON (AP) --

Senate Republican leader Trent Lott, fighting to surmount a furor over his racially insensitive remarks, complained Wednesday about anonymous White House leaks calling for his demise.

"There seems to be some things that are seeping out that have not been helpful," Lott said after a speech to the Chamber of Commerce in Biloxi, Miss.

"I understand how that happens because you've got a lot of people who work there that have different points of view," he told reporters. "But I believe they do support what I am trying to do here and the president will continue to do so."

For his part, though, President Bush declined again Wednesday to address the controversy when asked why his spokesman has repeatedly said that Lott should keep his job. Trying to distance himself from the racially charged issue, Bush has dodged questions about Lott since he condemned the Mississippi senator last Thursday.

But his brother, Florida Gov. Jeb Bush, said Lott's since recanted endorsement of South Carolina Sen. Strom Thurmond's 1948 segregationist presidential campaign was "damaging" Republicans.

"It doesn't help to have this swirling controversy that Sen. Lott, in spite of his enormous political skills, doesn't seem to be able to handle well," Gov. Bush told The Miami Herald. "Something's going to have to change. This can't be the topic of conversation over the next week."

Officials close to the White House are suggesting that Lott step down, and Senate Republicans indicated they need to resolve the situation before the beginning of next year's Congress.

But Lott thinks he will survive. "I'm telling you here this morning, I'm hanging in there," Lott told the Biloxi Chamber of Commerce. "I'm going to find a way for myself, my family, my friends, you the people of Mississippi and America to benefit from this experience."

Lott, who told ABC News he has talked to almost all of the Senate GOP caucus, said he believed a "majority" of Republicans in the Senate support him. He said he would continue working to keep his job in the days leading up to a Jan. 6 meeting where Republicans are to decide his future.

Meantime, the Virginia NAACP called on the state's U.S. senators to dump Lott as majority leader. "We demand that our senators vote against Trent Lott," said King Salim Khalfani, executive director of the chapter

GOP officials are concerned that removing Lott from his leadership position might prompt his resignation from the Senate, which would throw the Senate back into a 50-50 split if Mississippi's Democratic governor picks a member of his own party to serve on an interim basis.

But Lott insisted Wednesday that he would not give up his Senate seat. "I was elected by the people of Mississippi to a six-year term," he told reporters. "I've served two years of that contract. I have a contract and I'm going to fulfill it."

Yet, officials said there have been discussions among senators eager to have a successor to Lott emerge as the party's leader when the Senate convenes under Republican control next month.

"There is now a substantial question as to whether Senator Lott has the capacity to move" the GOP agenda in the new Congress, said Sen. Jim Talent, R-Mo., one of the new guard of Republicans whose election last month helped deliver a majority to the GOP.

There was a widespread consensus among the GOP operatives and strategists that Lott must go. The opinion was shared by senior White House aides, but officials there insisted that neither Bush, political guru Karl Rove or his deputies were even indirectly involved in a campaign against Lott.

Lott triggered the controversy Dec. 5 at a 100th birthday party for Thurmond. He said people in Mississippi were proud to have voted for Thurmond at the time, adding, "if the rest of the country had followed our lead, we wouldn't have had all these problems over all these years either."

He since has apologized repeatedly, including in a news conference at home in Mississippi where he asked for forgiveness and forbearance, and on Black Entertainment Television on Monday night where he announced his support for affirmative action despite having voted against such programs in the past.

Sen. Pat Roberts of Kansas, echoing many others, called for a final decision to be made before the new year. "This matter has gone beyond the statement of a single individual to one of national importance, and unfortunately divisiveness and turmoil. As such, this situation should be and very well may be resolved prior (to) Jan. 6," he said.

One lawmaker who has spoken with Lott in recent days said the Mississippian appears to have the support of most members of his leadership team and many senior members, some of whom are in line to become committee chairmen and may value maximum independence from the White House when it comes time to negotiate over legislation. "But he was also fully aware that this thing is very fluid and dynamic," said the lawmaker, who spoke on condition of anonymity.

There was no shortage of speculation about replacement candidates.

Talk centered on Sen. Don Nickles, R-Okla., the outgoing No. 2 Republican and a longtime Lott rival, along with Sens. Mitch McConnell, R-Ky.; and Rich Santorum, R-Pa.

©2002 Associated Press  


TOPICS: Front Page News; Government
KEYWORDS: stopthebleeding
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240 ... 381-389 next last
To: dirtboy
At least I'm not siding with Jesse Jackson and James Carville.
201 posted on 12/18/2002 11:18:17 AM PST by AppyPappy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 190 | View Replies]

To: JDGreen123
he is a racist and will never be leader
202 posted on 12/18/2002 11:18:50 AM PST by TLBSHOW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 185 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks
Kewel. Love that area. Have friends over in Buena Vista and love it there too. Maybe I'll see you sometime down there.
203 posted on 12/18/2002 11:18:55 AM PST by ApesForEvolution
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 193 | View Replies]

To: Physicist
That question should be directed at Trent Lott. He's the only one who can turn that seat over to the Dems.

If he is too racist to be Majority Leader, how can he be a Senator?

204 posted on 12/18/2002 11:18:57 AM PST by AppyPappy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 189 | View Replies]

To: ApesForEvolution
BUSH IS FOR AA
205 posted on 12/18/2002 11:19:55 AM PST by TLBSHOW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 199 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy
his words were loaded by any historical interpretation

Correction: You mean "I ASSUME his words were loaded by any historical interpretation". In reality, you don't know and you believe Jesse Jackson over Trent Lott.

206 posted on 12/18/2002 11:19:56 AM PST by AppyPappy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 196 | View Replies]

To: Publius6961
SmokingGun.com is a very reputable site. They pony up the money to get original documents and photos that are part of the public record. They then scan the documents.
207 posted on 12/18/2002 11:20:03 AM PST by GraniteStateConservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy
So Lott was lying because you can't find something?

Sorry.. I can't find something that does not exist. Lott and his defenders have yet to come up with anything from Thurmond on defense in 1948, either.

That tells a thinking person all they need to know. Lott was lying.

208 posted on 12/18/2002 11:20:25 AM PST by Darling Lili
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 181 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy
At least I'm not siding with Jesse Jackson and James Carville.

Hank, Hank, Hank. I could trot out a laundry list of conservatives who agree with me, and you would still have not addressed the question.

209 posted on 12/18/2002 11:20:28 AM PST by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 201 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy
At least I'm not siding with Jesse Jackson and James Carville.


LIKE the clueless ones at fr
210 posted on 12/18/2002 11:21:19 AM PST by TLBSHOW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 201 | View Replies]

To: Darling Lili
If Lott is lying, you should have no trouble proving that. Please do so.
211 posted on 12/18/2002 11:21:19 AM PST by AppyPappy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 208 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy
you would still have not addressed the question.

What question?

212 posted on 12/18/2002 11:21:51 AM PST by AppyPappy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 209 | View Replies]

To: TennesseeProfessor
Trent Lott has publicly said:

As majority leader, I can move an agenda that would have things that would be helpful to African-Americans and minorities of all kinds and all Americans, but specifically aimed at showing African-Americans that they have particular concerns and needs that we have to advance an agenda that will help rural and ...
I don't want a Republican leader pursuing that agenda. I want a Republican leader pursuing the President's agenda of tax cuts and sound judges. Even worse, Trent Lott made it much harder for those of us with pricipled stands against minority set-asides or reverse discrimination to explain that we aren't racists.


Thank you. And now, the vacuous one is giving us that opportunity! Hallelujah! What's that on the horizon? Hope? Yes, yes indeed...
213 posted on 12/18/2002 11:21:56 AM PST by ApesForEvolution
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 188 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy
list of conservatives

please do I am collecting names of the traitors
214 posted on 12/18/2002 11:22:48 AM PST by TLBSHOW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 209 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy
If Byrd had publicly said what Lott said and you were aware of it, would you complain that Byrd make a racist comment and that the dems and the media gave him a pass on it? Be honest.
215 posted on 12/18/2002 11:22:59 AM PST by alnick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy
You mean "I ASSUME his words were loaded by any historical interpretation".

No assumption necessary, Hank. You don't have to figure out what Lott meant or what his motive was, you can read his words at face value, look up the underlying facts, and connect the dots. You're not even willing to pick up the pencil.

In reality, you don't know and you believe Jesse Jackson over Trent Lott.

Still trying that lame approach. Once again, a tremendous number of conservatives agree with my position. How many agree with yours, that Lott's comments are not racially loaded? Oh, and BTW, Trent Lott is agreeing with the position of Jesse Jackson now, last I checked.

216 posted on 12/18/2002 11:24:27 AM PST by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 206 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy
"When this whole thing shakes out, the Democrats will get the Senate"

BS. Appy, you've said all along that it's Lott's words that count, as he says them. Well, try these on:

GOP officials are concerned that removing Lott from his leadership position might prompt his resignation from the Senate, which would throw the Senate back into a 50-50 split if Mississippi's Democratic governor picks a member of his own party to serve on an interim basis.

But Lott insisted Wednesday that he would not give up his Senate seat. "I was elected by the people of Mississippi to a six-year term," he told reporters. "I've served two years of that contract. I have a contract and I'm going to fulfill it."


How do you read those?
217 posted on 12/18/2002 11:24:48 AM PST by ApesForEvolution
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 195 | View Replies]

To: TLBSHOW
please do I am collecting names of the traitors

Don't bother. You can't count that high.

218 posted on 12/18/2002 11:25:33 AM PST by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 214 | View Replies]

To: alnick
Byrd has already made overt racist comments and is allowed to keep his seat. That standard should exist for everyone if it exists for one. We can't have the Democrats saying "It's OK for us but not you".
219 posted on 12/18/2002 11:25:45 AM PST by AppyPappy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 215 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy
Whatever Lott's motive was (I lean towards imbecility)

Agreed. And that's largely been his "motive" with all his varied stabs at damage control, too. The total ineptness of this man is astounding, IMO. How in the world did he ever get to be Leader in the first place?

220 posted on 12/18/2002 11:26:50 AM PST by Darling Lili
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 196 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240 ... 381-389 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson