Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: AppyPappy
You mean "I ASSUME his words were loaded by any historical interpretation".

No assumption necessary, Hank. You don't have to figure out what Lott meant or what his motive was, you can read his words at face value, look up the underlying facts, and connect the dots. You're not even willing to pick up the pencil.

In reality, you don't know and you believe Jesse Jackson over Trent Lott.

Still trying that lame approach. Once again, a tremendous number of conservatives agree with my position. How many agree with yours, that Lott's comments are not racially loaded? Oh, and BTW, Trent Lott is agreeing with the position of Jesse Jackson now, last I checked.

216 posted on 12/18/2002 11:24:27 AM PST by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 206 | View Replies ]


To: dirtboy
Once again, read what Lott said, not what you think he meant. He said nothing about segregation or race. You ASSUMED that.

A tremendous number of conservatives are siding with the liberals. That is not good politics.

222 posted on 12/18/2002 11:27:57 AM PST by AppyPappy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 216 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson