Skip to comments.
ARAB BEATS UP JEWISH GIRL AT B'KLYN SCHOOL
New York Post ^
| 12/17/02
| CARL CAMPANILE and MURRAY WEISS
Posted on 12/17/2002 8:19:45 AM PST by nypokerface
Edited on 05/26/2004 5:10:44 PM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
December 17, 2002 -- Religious tensions erupted yesterday after authorities confirmed that an Arab girl beat up a Jewish girl at a Brooklyn middle school.
The Arab teen was arrested and suspended for the Dec. 12 attack on the 13-year-old Jewish girl, an honors student, at IS 259 in Dycker Heights, sources said.
(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...
TOPICS: Activism/Chapters; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Front Page News; US: New York
KEYWORDS: brooklyn; educationnews; muchado
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220, 221-240, 241-260, 261 next last
To: JMP
We had a bunch of Arabs pick on a girl because whe was Jewish and one attacked her.
You are belittling the incident.
221
posted on
12/17/2002 3:32:05 PM PST
by
rmlew
To: Bella_Bru
Because Arabs are more PC than Jews and have been ever since Stalin set that policy in 1953.
222
posted on
12/17/2002 3:32:59 PM PST
by
rmlew
To: eno_
Send the perps back home so they can use sand for toilet paper and toothpaste.Hahaha .......
223
posted on
12/17/2002 3:35:35 PM PST
by
dennisw
To: swarthyguy
I don't know who attacked who. My point is that you don't know either. The article does not give you the facts to know. It is your biases as well as the bias in the article that causes your mind to fabricate any facts that you might need to justify your bias. Thats my point, nothing more. Your cognitive processes are showing.
224
posted on
12/17/2002 3:41:11 PM PST
by
JMP
To: JMP
OK, I give up.
The entire article is a complete fabrication.
To: JMP
and just makes you look like a *looser*Uhhhhh.....never mind.
To: AppyPappy
JMPs a looser.
This is vey series.
To: rmlew
First Dr. Roberts claims victimhood status for the attackers When did I do that?
Are you a Neo-nazi or sympathyser, an Islamist or sympathyser, or an America and Jew hating leftist? I don't have enough information to tell which yet. (Is't it sad that these groups overlap so much)
Perhaps you missed the Al-Jazeera tapes where both Bin Laden and his right-hand man, Al Zawaheeri claimed AL-Qaeda's responsibiility
Sure, that was OBL on that tape (must have had some facial bone reconstruction done).
1. Saddam was also sponsored by the USSR.
2. Who says that OBL is unimportant.
As to #1 so what? As to #2, Bush did on March 13th 2002. No, I just think for myself and look at the big picture as to who has ultimately gained and lost after 9/11. I.e...
Lost |
Gained |
Freedoms of U.S. citizens |
Oil companies, smallpox vaccine companies, subsidary of Haliburton that makes the detention centers in Camp X-Ray, Carlisle |
Perhaps you missed the Al-Jazeera tapes where both Bin Laden and his right-hand man, Al Zawaheeri claimed AL-Qaeda's responsibiility
Seems that OBL had some some serious facial surgery (different nose) and gained a bit of weight in that scene.
1. Saddam was also sponsored by the USSR.
2. Who says that OBL is unimportant
As to #1, so what? As to #2, Bush did on March 13th 2002.
To: JMP
Did you believe any of the other facts reported in the Post today? The weather? Do you think they lied outright about the Jewish girl having been harassed? Did they lie about the Arab girls chanting "Jew Jew Jew!" They did, in fact, report a pattern of events leading up to the beating. You think it was pure lies? Press bias is one thing, but you are asking us to attribute malice to this reporter in what is usually a more conservative voice among NYC papers.
There is plety of press criticism on FR, so jump right in: Do YOU have any evidence the reporter is fabricating? Any pattern of previous fabrication? Freepers catch lies in the Times all the time, but they always have facts and alternative sources to back it up. Do you have any facts about THIS reporter and THIS story to suggest it isn't straightforward reporting?
If not, I'd say YOUR biases are the ones showing.
229
posted on
12/17/2002 3:48:41 PM PST
by
eno_
To: montag813
Nope. She will have three abortions and adopt a black baby in her 40's like every good Jewish liberal. Meanwhile each of the Arab girls will have 10 children and raise them to hate the Jews and America.Ewgh! You're probably right. Pardon me, I have to look for a razor blade.
To: A_perfect_lady; montag813
Gee, not much different from those "good" Catholic girls, eh?
To: rmlew
........We had a bunch of Arabs pick on a girl because whe was Jewish and one attacked her. You are belittling the incident...........
.
No, I'm not belittling anything. I stated what the article said. Others have fabricated more than what was stated. I have said that I do not know what happened yet I have the same set of facts as you. You get a lot more mileage out of the same facts. An agenda?
232
posted on
12/17/2002 4:08:36 PM PST
by
JMP
To: swarthyguy
.........OK, I give up.
The entire article is a complete fabrication......
.
I didn't say that either.
233
posted on
12/17/2002 4:13:07 PM PST
by
JMP
To: JMP
>> I don't know who attacked who. My point is that you don't know either. The article does not give you the facts to know.
You said that. I agree with you.
The article may or may not be a fabrication. The facts are hard to judge. It may have been arabs beating up a girl who may be or may not have been jewish. SHe may be an honors student but then again, maybe not. The arabs, or a group of unidentified swarthy (maybe) persons, possibly honor students, may or may not have attacked a girl calling herself a jew. The police, may or may not have arrested an individual who may be a girl or an arab (maybe) in drag.
To: eno_
............Do you have any facts about THIS reporter and THIS story to suggest it isn't straightforward reporting?
.
No I don't, but in the best case it is very poor reporting. I have stated earlier that it is curious that an altercation of this nature makes the news. You don't find that curious? What this article clearly states is Jew=good, Arab=bad. Maybe you believe that the article is stating Jew=bad and Arab=good. Is that what it is?
235
posted on
12/17/2002 4:27:25 PM PST
by
JMP
To: joesnuffy
....the pedophile profitIs there profit in pedophilia??
Sorry, couldn't resist. Of course you meant prophet......or did you? d;^)
To: Alouette
The only thing that irritates me is the knee-jerking that goes on around here as a matter of course.
237
posted on
12/17/2002 4:58:50 PM PST
by
Illbay
To: droberts
Teh British, French, and Jews gained from Peral Harbor.
It was the British, not the French who first attacked an enemy harbor with carrier borne planes with their raid on Taranto.
Using your logic, it was the British who bombed Pearl Harbor.
They probably even sunk the HMS Prince of Wales and HMS Repulse teh next day to make it look good!
238
posted on
12/17/2002 5:21:38 PM PST
by
rmlew
To: JMP
No, you appear to have made judgments. Your statements are supportive of the idiots who feel opressed by teenage girls to the point they blow themselves up.
FACT1) The assailant is ARAB girl.
Fact2)The victim is a Jewish girl.
Fact3) the assailant taunted the victim repeatedly and using her ethnicity as a taunt.
Fact4)That is a hate crime.
Nope, not reading anything into it. You are.
To: JMP
You said in post #163 and I quote: "1) We know the jewish young lady was an honor student. What do we know about the Arab girls academics?"
You made it an issue.
So, The arabs now feel opressed because they can't get on the honor roll?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220, 221-240, 241-260, 261 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson