Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BuddhaBoy
Ya. Nickels I don't think would have the votes. The caucus is more moderate than he is (a majority are), and won't like his image. (Granted, personal relationships mean a lot, and I don't know who is on good personal terms with whom.) His elevation might cause Chafee, etc. to threaten to exit. Plus, since he is the guying that came out with the knife, everyone with good relations with Lott will go for someone other than Nicles. I would think Frist would be a more concensus candidate. My guess, is that if Bush wants Lott out via a new election, then Frist will hop in. If he doesn't, Lott might well beat Nickles. In any event, I would suggest that placing your money on Nickles would be a poor bet, at least if the spread is not hugely in your favor.
203 posted on 12/15/2002 8:00:54 AM PST by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 186 | View Replies ]


To: Torie
I think Frist would win if nominated, but he is a waste in that job. I think you are right about Chaffee. I also don’t think Nickles would have spoken up this morning if he wanted the job. Frist is very likely, but I would still wish for Rick Santorum.
223 posted on 12/15/2002 8:07:31 AM PST by BuddhaBoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 203 | View Replies ]

To: Torie
Any chance that a conservative/moderate rift between Nickles supporters and Frist supporters might lead to Kay Bailey Hutchison as a compromise candidate?

OK, the Texas tri-fecta might be too much, but I wanted to throw out a 'smoke-filled backroom' scenario (Judge Roy Bean style).
258 posted on 12/15/2002 8:18:20 AM PST by Diddle E. Squat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 203 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson