Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jwalsh07
By the way, I agree with you that appeasement never works. But I do not see this as a case of appeasement.

No matter what we do, the race baiting poverty pimps are going to castigate us. Period. They won't be emboldened if we dump Lott. They won't be satiated if we do. Appeasement is giving something an oppressor wants to them hoping to get them to ease up. They won't ease up, and they don't really want Lott gone.

The people we would be making a change for are ourselves for our own moral integrity and political benefit when aiming at the voters we hope to sway. We would not be making a change hoping that the baiters would stop. They won't.

In other words, other than for our own integrity, the people we are aiming for are not needing appeasement. The undecided voters are not the ones clamoring. But they are ones who will be listening in a few years to all the ads, and they are the ones who will be watching what we say and do.

249 posted on 12/13/2002 7:15:25 PM PST by William McKinley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 241 | View Replies ]


To: William McKinley
I admit it could go either way. But if President Bush puts one in Hussein's ear and something more than anemic growth happens by the end of next year, I think it will work out.

Bush is not going to stop pushing for the minority vote. He truly believes that all men are created equal and endowed by the creator with rights and that every life is a precious one. Bush is the face of the party, not Lott.

257 posted on 12/13/2002 7:22:17 PM PST by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 249 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson