Posted on 12/13/2002 3:56:24 PM PST by A.J.Armitage
Trent Lott, the Republican Party's eternal Maalox moment, has given the Beltway's liberal pontiffs on race exactly what they crave: a big, fat excuse to extract legislative payoffs to ease their collective "pain."
On Wednesday, the Senate Republican leader went on Fox News and CNN promising more race-conscious government remedies to make amends for his tacit endorsement of segregation. In interviews with Sean Hannity and Larry King, Lott cravenly pledged support for "community renewal" (more minority set-asides); said he would "put more money into education so no child is left behind" (more federal spending for failed urban programs); and boasted of his "African-American interns" and appointments (more racial preferences).
My fellow conservatives, if you weren't already convinced that the Mississippi senator was a gutless, ineffective, self-preservationist sap before his remarks at Strom Thurmond's 100th birthday party last week, this pandering to the race Mafiosi in the aftermath of his comments seals the deal.
Democrats are circling the wagons. Senator Joe Lieberman of Connecticut demanded that Lott "speak from his moral center" (this presumes he has one) and that he "make clear his commitment to racial equality." How does Lieberman think Lott should do this? Oh, no, not by calling for an end to government racial preferences (as Lieberman once did before he was re-educated) or by meeting with the true moral heirs of the civil rights movement -- leaders like conservative Ward Connerly who could teach Lott a lesson or two about principled support for race neutrality and how best to achieve it.
Lieberman wants Lott to meet "with the members of the Congressional Black Caucus (to) show that he understands the hurt his comments have caused." Yes, by meeting with the racial demagogues of the Black Caucus, Lott can show his clarion commitment to racial equality.
And how will the "hurt" be repaired? Rep. Bennie Thompson, D-Miss., already has his wish list in order. According to the Biloxi Sun Herald, Thompson thinks Lott can "make up for his statement" by "pushing for a minimum wage increase, expanded affordable housing and a prescription drug benefit." Cha-cha-ching.
Both liberals and conservatives who are lambasting the vacant Lott as an unrepentant bigot give him too much credit, methinks. The former college cheerleader did at Thurmond's birthday party what he has done all of his life: He mouthed the words he thought his audience at the moment wanted to hear. Lott never actively donned a white sheet, like his Senate colleague and ex-Klansman Robert Byrd, D-West Va. Instead, Lott is, and always has been, on the sidelines of America's race debate.
When James Meredith weathered violent riots in his brave quest to integrate the University of Mississippi in the fall of 1962, Lott was neither standing next to him nor standing with the segregationist mob. The Ole Miss alum was holed up inside his frat house, preserving his and his brothers' political viability.
There is only one cause, one animating spirit that Trent Lott is committed to: not the South, not the segregationist past, but himself and his future in high office. And now, to save his hide, Lott will shake his pompoms and turn somersaults to please whomever (Rep. Maxine Waters, D-Calif., the Rev. Al Sharpton) can help him stay in power.
One of the supreme ironies in all this mess is that the White House and GOP leadership are entirely comfortable with the kind of contemptible race-conscious payoffs Lott is poised to make on behalf of the Republican Party. As governor of Texas, George W. Bush signed laws supporting minority contracting set-asides; directing electric utilities to develop diversity and set-aside plans; and creating race-targeted scholarship programs.
Bush also enthusiastically campaigned for a baseball stadium tax hike on the grounds that "a vote for the tax would be a vote for contracts for African American businesses," and to the horror of equal-opportunity conservatives, he ordered his Justice Department to support racially discriminatory federal contracting set-asides last year before the Supreme Court.
So while the headless chicken brigade here in Washington screams about Lott "tearing the country apart" with his idiotic words, the New Segregationist policies supported by both the party of Sharpton and the party of Bush continue unabated. It's racial logrolling as usual.
Thomas Sowell explains the only way to get black people's votes here. But it won't work if blacks think Republicans are closet racists. None of it will have credibility; instead of an alternative way forward, it'll be seen as a covert attempt to set them back.
Lott must go.
He also doesn't care about the Republican Party.
Spoken like a true totalitarian statist. Why don't you just aks to have her executed, that will not only silence this source of truth, but others as well.
Hank
Have you identified factual errors you don't want to tell the rest of us about?
Do you disagree with her premise that Lott will sell favors to keep the other socialists off his back, at our expense?
Do you think there is nothing wrong with what Lott said?
Are you part of Lott's staff?
Do you think the First Amendment only applies to people you agree with?
What, exactly, is your problem with this article?
It's a sad thing in America that people can't discuss what our masters in Washington are doing without getting labeled. "Commie" used to be the bad word, now it's bigot. Neither needed to be proven
Lott's actual offense was talking while Republican. Do not kid yourselves. He is simply being "Borked" because the Dems want an issue at the very least, and if possible by hook or crook, the Senate back.
Nobody in the entire affair is standing up for a real principle yet. The only real principle involved is that the gravity of an accusation does not constitute proof of it, and makes any accusation less likely not more so. The exact reverse is the obvious standard being applied.
Lott is being smeared as a racist when he simply isn't, and no one is saying that is outrageous. Whether they refrain because they do the same themselves, or don't like the man, or want to avoid the stink cloud, makes no difference whatever. All concerned, to date, have been unjust and cowardly about the entire flap.
I have to leave. Nice meeting ya'.
Pukimo malakai!!
I agree. She doesn't know a GD thing about the Ballpark in Arlington, a project fully supported by the taxpayers of Arlington.
Now, she's slamming George W. for a project that has been a boon to the Metroplex.
She's a shrill...well, let's just let it go at that.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.