INSIDE STORY OF SOUTH DAKOTA VOTING CONTROVERSY (FRAUD!!)

FoxNews ^ | 12/10/02 | Brit Hume

[Elkiejg]

This is a partial transcript of Special Report with Brit Hume, December 9, that has been edited for clarity.

BRIT HUME, HOST: When incumbent Democratic Senator Tim Johnson was re-elected in South Dakota by a scant 524 votes, a margin provided by three precincts, largely on Indian reservations in the western part of the state, there was suspicion of fraud. After all, there had been a federal investigation, but not an indictment, of pre-election registration efforts on Indian reservations.

[Coop]

Your post demonstrates your lack of understanding of the situation. In an "off-Presidential", or mid-term election, Thune shouldn't have had a chance.

I suggest you go back and review some data.

[Dante3]

bttt

[cgbg]

Just imagine: Somewhere out there is a Republican Majority Leader who will refuse to seat Johnson in the Senate pending reolution of an investigation into voter fraud in South Dakota.

Hint: Lott dosen't have the cojones to do the right thing. Now if he tried it the media would jump on it as more proof of his racism.

Dump Lott. Then refuse to seat Johnson!

[clodkicker]

In my small county you don't have to tell them who you are when you go into vote because they already know you. We had 4 or 5 precincts in one room and as usual I couldn't remember which one I was in so I just walked by until one of the polling workers said you vote in this one. I would guess this ability to ID people coming in to vote would also apply in the reservation counties.
No doubt that there was DNC fraud going on.