Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Jimmy Carter Friend to America's Enemies, Enemy to America's Friends
Chuck Morse Forum ^ | 12/06/2002 | Chuck Morse

Posted on 12/10/2002 7:26:35 PM PST by Cup of Joe

Jimmy Carter says he is "disappointed" with President George W. Bush in an interview.....


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: carter
Jimmy Carter says he is "disappointed" with President George W. Bush in an interview appearing in the Columbus Ledger-Enquirer. He's annoyed that President Bush hasn't stabbed Israel in the back, at this most precarious time, by not insisting, as he did as President, upon the "removal of Israeli settlements on the West Bank". He is critical that Bush hasn't signed on to the Kyoto Protocol, which would devastate our industrial sector. And, most astonishingly, he's upset that Bush has been reluctant to ratify the UN rights of the child treaty, a treaty that would effectively transfer custody of every American child into the hands of the UN New World Order.

The Carter Administration, 1977-1980, as a matter of routine, sold out our allies and aided our enemies. His actions condemned nations to left-wing tyranny, Islamic fundamentalist dictatorship, and war. His policies hurt America's economy, weakened our military, and encouraged the "malaise" that he famously referred to. With the election of Ronald Reagan, America rejected the malaise and began to pull itself out from the rubble. Following is a brief revisiting of the Carter foreign policy.

Carter was complicit in overthrowing the elected government of Anastasio Somosa in Nicaragua. Somosa had been elected President of Nicaragua in 1974 in an election overseen by the OAS, which reported no irregularities. Somosa would be demonized by the international left including their apparatchiks in the American media. On January 23, 1979, the French weekly Valeurs Actuelles reported the following comments by Mexican President Lopez Portillo:

"When President Carter visited me I told him: "I do not particularly like Somosa or his regime, as you know. But if the Sandanistas unseat him and replace him with a Castro-picked Government it will have a profound effect on Nicaragua,s neighbors and certainly touch off a slide to the left in my country". It was as though he did not hear a word of what I had said. He told me: "Oh Mr. President, you must do something to help me get rid of this Somosa"."

Carter would proceed to strangle our Nicaraguan ally by forcing the IMF and the World Bank to cut off credit, to embargo beef and coffee, and to prohibit weapons sales to the Nicaraguan military. He would force American allies to do the same, as he would pressure Israel to recall a ship with munitions bound for Nicaragua. Once Somosa was deposed, Carter would push through Congress a $75 million aid package for the new Marxist government of Daniel Ortega. Carter held as a crowning achievement of his administration, the selling out of the Panama Canal to the Panamanians who are proceeding to transfer functional authority to Communist China.

Carter sold out the Shah of Iran in a similar manner. Like Somosa, the international left sent down their marching orders to their apparatchiks in the press and the Shah, a rather liberal leader by Middle East standards, would be suddenly transformed into the Great Satan. The Shah was attempting to quell communist supported uprisings by Marxist and Islamic fundamentalist forces. He was stymied in his efforts by the direct intervention of the Carter administration, which forced him, by use of threats, to accommodate the insurrectionists. This led to the collapse of his pro western government in 1979 to be followed by the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan and the hostage crisis in Tehran. Today, Iran is one of the world's most oppressive regimes and is a center of international terrorism.

On December 15, 1978, Carter terminated our relations with Taiwan and recognized Communist China, the most murderous regime in the history of the planet. He did this after Congress had adjourned for Christmas. The Senate, earlier that year, had voted 94-0 on a resolution that it should be consulted before any change in the treaty with Taiwan. Red China would proceed to benefit from a massive transfer of US credit and technology, a process that would reach an orgasmic climax during the Clinton Administration. Carter would remain silent in the face of the genocide performed by the Marxist Pol Pot. So much for Carter as the champion of "human rights".

In Africa, Carter would contribute to the selling out of Rhodesia to the Communist Robert Mugabe, and would maintain silence in the face of Soviet and Cuban military involvement in Africa. In short, Carter barely missed an opportunity to sell out an American ally to the Communists. Domestically, he presided over double-digit inflation and record deficits. Thank God President Bush has "disappointed "Jimmy Carter. He must be on the right track.

1 posted on 12/10/2002 7:26:40 PM PST by Cup of Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Cup of Joe
In accepting the NPP, Jimmy Carter dances all over the grave of Anwar Sadat.

Lots of blood on the hands of JC.

2 posted on 12/10/2002 7:31:18 PM PST by gov_bean_ counter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cup of Joe
I'm pretty sure there isn't a more dangerous place in the universe than to get between Carter and a murderous dictator that he can run to and shake hands and tell what a fine part of humanity the dictator really is...especially if there's a news camera in the neighborhood.

Seriously, Carter is great to have about these days. He is every bit the baffoon that Gerald Ford is. It's a good thing that the press likes to tout Carter quotes. It all makes Bush, who looks just fine in his own right, look that much better.

3 posted on 12/10/2002 7:40:47 PM PST by stevem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cup of Joe
I am glad Carter was president. He was so bad he helped to elect Ronald Reagan. Reagan in turn, defeated the Soviet Union without firing a shot, thus ending the Cold War and saving millions of lives.

As far as I am concerned, Jimmy is only standing in for Ronald Reagan's well deserved peace prize. Direct recognition of Reagan's achievement will come in due time, as Carter's puny little star will surely fade away.

4 posted on 12/10/2002 7:46:26 PM PST by elbucko
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: elbucko
Too bad Americans didn't learn that small petty men don't make good presidents and they make even lousier commanders in chief.
5 posted on 12/10/2002 7:51:08 PM PST by OldFriend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Cup of Joe
Hi .I'm Jimmy Carter.

If we all turn our thermostats down to 65 degrees

and wear one of these nice cardigan sweaters

we can get over our malaise.

You gotta hand it to Carter.A man with a plan.


6 posted on 12/10/2002 7:54:54 PM PST by smoothsailing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing
I was in college in Madison, WI during Carter's administration. I wore long underwear to class everyday and never could get warm!!

Remember the gas lines and the misery factor? (was it inflation plus unemployment?)

7 posted on 12/10/2002 8:35:38 PM PST by Angel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: elbucko
As far as I am concerned, Jimmy is only standing in for Ronald Reagan's well deserved peace prize. Direct recognition of Reagan's achievement will come in due time, as Carter's puny little star will surely fade away.

Forget the Nobel Peace (at any price) Prize. It is a tainted relic. More people in the 20th century died as the result of tyranical governments than died from wars. the Norwegian parliment prefers to award the peace prize to "leaders" who suck up to these tyrants rather than real leader who rid the world of them. I would rather have a Freedom prize endowed that would be awarded to those individuals who have done the most to advance freedom in the world. I think such a prize ought to be named for President Ronald Reagan.

8 posted on 12/10/2002 9:00:30 PM PST by Paleo Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Angel
I was in college in Madison, WI during Carter's administration. I wore long underwear to class everyday and never could get warm!!

How many students at the University of Wisconsin voted to reelect Carter in 1980?

9 posted on 12/10/2002 9:01:59 PM PST by Paleo Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Cup of Joe
Jimmy Carter was a lousy President, but a good man.

I thought this for many years ,as did others. He pulled one off on a great number of people. In fact, there are still some that still believe this. They don't know the facts. He was almost as bad as Clinton when it came to his policies. Every move he made hurt this country. Almost, as if he was a traitor. He is pretty darn close.

10 posted on 12/10/2002 9:16:27 PM PST by auggy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Angel
LUCKY ME. I never had to freeze in Madison.

I do remember the misery factor.

But then Reagan came along and we all thawed out.

FRegards....

11 posted on 12/10/2002 9:32:28 PM PST by smoothsailing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson