[justshutupandtakeit]

YOur original point to me was that you believed the constitutional provisions for rules and regulations with regard to federal property and territory somehow gave the Congress the power to let states leave. That was shown to be a mistaken interpretation of what the section was referring to.

If there is some other point that I missed let me know. My other assertions were additional backup against the idea that there was a right of secession in the document.

[Libertarianize the GOP]

YOur original point to me was that you believed the constitutional provisions for rules and regulations with regard to federal property and territory somehow gave the Congress the power to let states leave. That was shown to be a mistaken interpretation of what the section was referring to.

Just because you like your opinion doesn't mean it proves a point.