[Libertarianize the GOP]

YOur original point to me was that you believed the constitutional provisions for rules and regulations with regard to federal property and territory somehow gave the Congress the power to let states leave. That was shown to be a mistaken interpretation of what the section was referring to.

Just because you like your opinion doesn't mean it proves a point.

[justshutupandtakeit]

I don't think you will find a lawyer or anyone who has studied constitutional law who would agree with your interpretation of the section of the constitution. It has nothing to do with my opinion but with the use of logic and history to form a conclusion. It should be easy enough to show how your opinion is justified if it is formed using logic and historical fact. But, since it is just wishful thinking with no logic nor a shred of evidence backing it up, it won't be.