Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

I don't think I've ever seen a more leftist-slanted report yet on 60 Minutes.
1 posted on 12/08/2002 5:33:09 PM PST by geedee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: geedee
exagerating should be exaggerating.
2 posted on 12/08/2002 5:34:13 PM PST by geedee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: geedee
I watched about a minute and a half and saw where it was going so I turned it off. I don't believe I'll be watching 60 minutes in the future. They are transparent in their desparation though, and I guess that is a good thing.
3 posted on 12/08/2002 5:36:45 PM PST by Bahbah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: geedee
I saw it and came here to see if anyone was discussing it. I know that I shouldn't be surprised at CBS's bias, but it still never ceases to amaze me. This story ranks right up there with the snowjob they did on Clinton that got him elected. I've got to stop watching this drivel.
4 posted on 12/08/2002 5:39:56 PM PST by Lorraine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: geedee
I'm watching Charlie Brown's Christmas, so, no.

But Bob Simon is the guy who almost got his ass shot off in the Gulf War. He was missing for several days behind Iraqi lines.

He's a disgusting liberal.

5 posted on 12/08/2002 5:40:14 PM PST by sinkspur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: geedee
Not just CBS-you can see where the whole media is heading-Hussein is the good guy-Bush is the bad guy.
8 posted on 12/08/2002 5:44:42 PM PST by Wild Irish Rogue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: geedee
My husband watched it and believed every word. He used to be a Republican, but switched to the Constitution Party because he felt so betrayed by the Republican leadership. Now he is eager to hear anything negative about Bush. We got into a big screaming match when I tried to tell him to consider the source.

I keep trying to counter my husband's arguments, but then he comes up with some other story he heard. I know that Bush is not perfect, but he is overall such a great and wonderful president. Is there a site or source that refutes all the lies that are told about him? It sure would be a great resource. If anyone knows of something like that, please list it.

-Desperate

9 posted on 12/08/2002 5:48:36 PM PST by rimtop56
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: geedee
Yeah, well, Peter Arnett is being propped up by MSNBC and that liar is just disturbing to watch, with his joviality with Hussein and star effing poses.

Talk about a person totally committed to spewing lies and subterfuge, a deeply disturbed person.

15 posted on 12/08/2002 5:56:01 PM PST by Benrand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: geedee
Here's the teaser on Simon's piece from CBSNEWS.com . . .

Selling The Iraq War To The U.S.

(CBS) Politicians have had to sell the public on going to war since Colonial times, but they never had the arsenal of advertising and communications techniques the Bush administration is using to sell a possible war on Iraq. Bob Simon reports on those techniques and those employed by the elder Bush prior to the 1991 Gulf War Sunday, Dec. 8 at 7 p.m., ET/PT.

Simon reminds viewers that a horrible story spread widely by the first Bush administration prior to the Gulf War about Kuwaiti babies pulled from incubators by invading Iraqis turned out not to be true. The current Bush administration may be also misinforming the public in its efforts to justify a possible second war with Saddam Hussein.

One example of misinformation, according to physicist and former weapons inspector David Albright, was the Bush administration’s leak to the media in September about Iraq’s attempt to import aluminum tubes which administration officials claimed were headed for Iraq’s nuclear program.

“I think it was very misleading,” says Albright, who directs the Institute for Science and International Security. Albright says the tubes could be possibly used for a nuclear program, but were more suited to conventional weapons production. Government experts thought that too, Albright tells Simon, but administration officials “were selectively picking information to bolster a case that the Iraqi nuclear threat was more imminent than it is, and, in essence, scare people.”

Simon’s report examines the administration’s use of Madison Avenue to produce an ad campaign aimed at improving the image of America in the Muslim world. He also interviews a former CIA agent who investigated the oft-mentioned report that hijacker Mohammed Atta met with an Iraqi intelligence official in Prague several months before the deadly attacks on 9/11.

Despite a lack of evidence that the meeting took place, the item was cited by administration officials as high as Vice President Dick Cheney and ended up being reported so widely that two-thirds of Americans polled by the Council on Foreign Relations believe Iraq was behind the terrorist attacks of 9/11.

© MMII, CBS Worldwide Inc. All Rights Reserved. >

18 posted on 12/08/2002 6:17:06 PM PST by geedee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: geedee
I only watched the intro and then changed it to the Charlie Brown Christmas Special. I figured that show would be better for my blood pressure.
20 posted on 12/08/2002 6:27:51 PM PST by inflorida
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: geedee

Click for an interesting look at how the Nazis handled the same problems Saddam is wrestling with today.

24 posted on 12/08/2002 7:02:14 PM PST by The Great Satan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: geedee
I missed it. However, the fact is, Bush has done a piss poor job of making his case. I am for removing Saddam. Heck, I wanted Papa Bush to finish the job in Gulf War I. But W. obviously hasn't explained to the American people, let alone the people of the world, why now. I hear about Saddam having WMD's. Well I wonder where he got them. And if I'm not mistaken, he has had them for over a decade. Why does he suddenly pose such a threat now? Why is the threat so serious that it justifies the spending of billions of American dollars to remove him? Not to mention the risk of reprisal from Saddam or those who sympathize with Saddam. And possibly with the very same WMD's. Well, we hear the same old stories about how this tyrant gassed his own people. Hey....been there....done that! Here is the plain truth. If Bush had information that Saddam posed a threat that was immediate and potentially mortal in nature to the U.S.A.....or Israel...then there would be little debate. The world...and America....who will bear the brunt of the cost in dollars and lives....would be in lock step to proceed in destoying Saddam and his apparatus. The sad truth is that one of two realities exist. Either Saddam's threat is so devastating that Bush cannot tell the world for fear of a panic.....or Bush doesn't really have the goods on Saddam. Neither one of these scenarios is very pretty.
30 posted on 12/08/2002 7:19:42 PM PST by hove
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: geedee
There has to be more to this bias media attacking a Republican president....Could it be "PAYOFFS"? Why do you think the liberal media would spread such Crap when most American's support Bush.
35 posted on 12/08/2002 7:50:10 PM PST by Arpege92
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: geedee
Yes, I watched it. A little like a car wreck--you just can't look away. I haven't seen anything as bad--no, wait! It was the worship piece done for Ron Kirk TWO DAYS before the election last month in Texas.

Now THAT was unbiased! /sarcasm>

52 posted on 12/09/2002 12:12:25 AM PST by lorrainer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: geedee
I caught only a moment - They were saying how much the Arab would loves everything American and that they just hate our policy - My only thought was more child like liberal logic. I turned to avoid retching.
56 posted on 12/09/2002 7:17:06 AM PST by KSCITYBOY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: geedee
60 Minutes - Bob Simon - GW's Propoganda machine!! Did anyone watch this drivel?

NO

I don't watch network news, CNN, PMSMBC, West (east) Wing, any NBC ABC CBS morning show. I got Dishnetwork and they are easy to avoid.

58 posted on 12/09/2002 7:36:56 AM PST by bmwcyle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: geedee
http://www.mediaresearchcenter.org/cyberalerts/2002/cyb20021210.asp#5

60 Minutes Dismissed, But Iraq Was “Tantalizingly Close” to Nuke

The day after 60 Minutes correspondent Bob Simon mocked President Bush for the supposedly baseless claim that in 1991 Saddam Hussein’s Iraqi regime was only six months away from building a nuclear weapon, Simon’s CBS News colleague Mark Phillips marveled at how an Iraqi official “admitted there not only were plans to build a nuclear device, the Iraqis were tantalizingly close to having one."

Phillips checked in from Baghdad and ominously began his December 9 CBS Evening News story: "The Iraqi declaration now being analyzed in Washington and elsewhere has put a new sense of urgency into the inspection process. Not just because of what was in the documents, but also because in describing their illicit weapons history the Iraqis bordered on boastfulness. In a surprisingly frank and brash admission, the man who has run Iraq's prohibited weapons programs admitted there not only were plans to build a nuclear device, the Iraqis were tantalizingly close to having one."

General Amir al-Sa'adi, Iraqi presidential advisor: "We haven't reached the final assembly of a bomb nor tested it, so if you want to follow that, there's no guarantee that you will succeed. It's for the IAEA to judge how close we were."

Now contrast that to the derisive tone, dismissive of any imminent treat from Iraq getting nukes, taken by Bob Simon on the December 8 60 Minutes, as recounted in the December 9 CyberAlert:

In a Sunday night 60 Minutes story, CBS News reporter Bob Simon contended that the Bush administration has exaggerated the threat from Iraq by selectively and misleadingly citing reports of Saddam Hussein’s efforts to build a nuclear weapon....

MRC analyst Brian Boyd took down what Simon claimed on the December 8 60 Minutes. Simon’s first example:

"It's generally assumed that Saddam does have chemical and biological weapons, but is he also on the verge of producing a nuclear bomb as the President says he's tried to do in the past?"

George W. Bush, date not noted: "I would remind you that when the inspectors first went into Iraq and were denied, finally denied access a report came out of the Atomic, the IAEA that they were six months away from developing a weapon. I don't know what more evidence we need."

David Albright: "There is no such report as far as I know."

Simon: "Physicist David Albright was a weapons inspector in Iraq during the 1990s and now directs a Washington think tank called the Institute for Science and International Security. He says contrary to what the President claimed, neither the International Atomic Energy Agency, the IAEA, nor any other investigative body has ever reported that Iraq was only six months away from the bomb.”

END of Excerpt of earlier CyberAlert

For how Simon contradicted an August CBS Evening News story by David Martin, how the time frame cited by Bush was an accurate estimate according to a 1991 IAEA report and how Simon had at least twice previously made clear his personal disagreement with Bush’s Iraq policy, see the December 9 CyberAlert: http://www.mediaresearch.org/cyberalerts/2002/cyb20021209.asp#2

Simon’s promotion from Middle East correspondent to 60 Minutes has an up side: Phillips and not Simon is in Iraq where Phillips seems a bit more interested in reality than potshots at those trying to protect the world from Saddam Hussein.

63 posted on 12/21/2002 8:41:28 AM PST by geedee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: geedee

I am adding to comments about the CBS 60 Minutes correspondent Bob Simon. I work in Israel. We heard about the "JUST ASKING" question that ran in the New York Post's PAGE SIX last week, on Sept. 29/04: "WHICH married male network news veteran who specializes in foreign assignments has been having an affair with a female Columbia grad about 10 years younger than his daughter? Former classmates spotted the young woman with him at the Essex House more than once, and say he visited her at the University of Virginia in Charlottesville over the weekend." The key part is that he specializes in foreign assignments. I am sure it is Bob Simon. The CBS 60 Minutes show he is on is also broadcast in Israel so he is well known in Israel. About a year ago I saw him at a Jerusalem hotel with a young American woman. When I made a remark about it to someone I know in the hotel's management office he said the hotel staff knew she had been staying with Bob Simon in his hotel room there for weeks. I recognized her because she worked in our office. I am sure she must be the same "female Columbia grad" that the NY Post referred to because I remember that she went to Columbia University in New York before she came to Israel. Her name is Maia Ridberg and she is probably only about 24 years old (and you know how old Bob Simon is.) She said she left her job in Jerusalem to go traveling and I later heard that she returned to the United States to start at the University of Virginia. I did not know that Bob Simon was married until the NY post published that last week. That weekend the NY Post referred to was Yom Kippur. That is disgusting that they cheated on his wife even on Yom Kippur. Like many of you we have long thought that Bob Simon is irresponsible in his reporting about the mideast but now it is clear that he lacks integrity as a man as well.


64 posted on 10/07/2004 10:52:00 PM PDT by elsay (60 Minutes' Bob Simon is NY Post's Page Six mystery man)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: geedee

I am adding to comments about the CBS 60 Minutes correspondent Bob Simon. I work in Israel. We heard about the "JUST ASKING" question that ran in the New York Post's PAGE SIX last week, on Sept. 29/04: "WHICH married male network news veteran who specializes in foreign assignments has been having an affair with a female Columbia grad about 10 years younger than his daughter? Former classmates spotted the young woman with him at the Essex House more than once, and say he visited her at the University of Virginia in Charlottesville over the weekend." The key part is that he specializes in foreign assignments. I am sure it is Bob Simon. The CBS 60 Minutes show he is on is also broadcast in Israel so he is well known in Israel. About a year ago I saw him at a Jerusalem hotel with a young American woman. When I made a remark about it to someone I know in the hotel's management office he said the hotel staff knew she had been staying with Bob Simon in his hotel room there for weeks. I recognized her because she worked in our office. I am sure she must be the same "female Columbia grad" that the NY Post referred to because I remember that she went to Columbia University in New York before she came to Israel. Her name is Maia Ridberg and she is probably only about 24 years old (and you know how old Bob Simon is.) She said she left her job in Jerusalem to go traveling and I later heard that she returned to the United States to start at the University of Virginia. I did not know that Bob Simon was married until the NY post published that last week. That weekend the NY Post referred to was Yom Kippur. That is disgusting that they cheated on his wife even on Yom Kippur. Like many of you we have long thought that Bob Simon is irresponsible in his reporting about the mideast but now it is clear that he lacks integrity as a man as well.


65 posted on 10/07/2004 11:08:09 PM PDT by elsay (60 Minutes' Bob Simon is NY Post's Page Six mystery man)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson