Skip to comments.
32 Americans Tapped As Rhodes Scholars
AP ^
| 12/8/02
| AP
Posted on 12/08/2002 6:21:37 AM PST by anniegetyourgun
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
Behold, the libs of tomorrow.
To: anniegetyourgun
It's not too impressive a title since Clinton claimed to be one.
2
posted on
12/08/2002 6:24:36 AM PST
by
FITZ
To: anniegetyourgun
Yep. Keep an eye on these SOBs (one literally IS an SOB).
To: FITZ
>>It's not too impressive a title since Clinton claimed to be one.<<
Where was his physical vigor though, if he had Monica doing most of the work? And as for integrity, maybe "semantics" is a better word for what Rhodes was looking for when Clinton won such a scholarship.
To: anniegetyourgun
The Rhodes Scholarships have had an occasional misfire. Try matching the word "integrity" to Billyjeff Clinton, it's like nailing jello to a wall. But over the years, the program has identified some pretty smart cookies. Based on reading the names, one group is "underrepresented" compared to population -- African-Americans. There is one, from Howard University. Also based on reading the names, there is one group that is "overrepresented" -- Asian-Americans. They are eight of the 32.
This is what high-level admissions based on merit, knowledge and hard work look like, as opposed to admissions based on skin color.
Congressman Billybob
Click for latest column on UPI, "Enrons Are Everywhere" This is also posted on FR.
Click for latest book, "to Restore Trust in America"
To: End The Hypocrisy
I'm surprised they don't have Chelsea Clinton on that list. Hillary must be steaming mad.
6
posted on
12/08/2002 6:51:32 AM PST
by
FITZ
To: FITZ
Chelsea's already @ Oxford, isn't she? Is she a Rhodes Scholar? Or maybe some Democrat endowed some new fellowship for her. Either way, the Clintons are now multi-millionaires.
To: Congressman Billybob
>>>This is what high-level admissions based on merit, knowledge and hard work look like, as opposed to admissions based on skin color.<<<
That's precisely why such quotas are necessary and justified. For enlightenment & guidance, feel free to visit:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/799154/posts?page=1
To: End The Hypocrisy
No, little Ms. Clintoon is definitely not a Rhodes scholar!
To: Congressman Billybob
Hmmmm....what about this one?.....I'll bet he's "African American".....Kamyar Cyrus Habib, Kirkland, Wash., Columbia University
To: texasbluebell
I wonder if Chelsea Clinton's SAT's were good enough to have gotten her into Stanford on her own merit?
To: End The Hypocrisy
There has ALWAYS been affirmative action for famous rich white people.
12
posted on
12/08/2002 9:23:54 AM PST
by
xm177e2
To: FITZ
Slick Willie certainly didn't have any of those attributes.
He got in using political influence (Senator Fulbright).
To: anniegetyourgun
I wish I had the time to investigate every single one of the names on that list. I'll bet I'd found out every single one of them is on there for reasons other than merit.
At least Princess Chelsea isn't on there.
And remember everyone, you're not a Rhodes Scholar until you finish the program. Billy Jeff never did.
14
posted on
12/08/2002 9:39:19 AM PST
by
Timesink
To: End The Hypocrisy
Chelsea's already @ Oxford, isn't she? Is she a Rhodes Scholar?She's definitely there because of who Daddy is, but she is most certainly NOT a Rhodes Scholar. (It's really not THAT hard to get into Oxford, BTW. Certain schools within the university, yes; overall, no.)
15
posted on
12/08/2002 9:41:08 AM PST
by
Timesink
To: anniegetyourgun
I have known 4-5 Rhodes Scholars personally in my lifetime. Additionally, I was nominated by my university to apply for the scholarship my senior year (each university "appoints" 2 applicants each year) and went through a portion of the interviewing process.
From my experience, I think I can say a couple of things about Rhodes Scholars. Yes, they are very smart and capable people. Generally, they very much deserve the accolades that they receive. However, the key component in obtaining a Rhodes Scholarship has always been extracurricular activities, not purely academic success. Probably the best way to get one of these scholarships is either to be a particularly smart athelete or to be a precocuious and intelligent liberal crusader. On the other hand, the quickest way to ruin your chances of ever getting one of these scholarships is to publicly advocate anything that could be labelled "coservative." That's just the way things work.
16
posted on
12/08/2002 9:51:36 AM PST
by
bourbon
To: xm177e2
There has ALWAYS been affirmative action for famous rich white people.
No joke. just look at the # of young actors/actresses who parlay sucess on the big screen into admission to an Ivy League school.
17
posted on
12/08/2002 9:53:52 AM PST
by
bourbon
To: upcountryhorseman
Slick Willie certainly didn't have any of those attributes. He got in using political influence (Senator Fulbright). It's obvious from his speeches and his actions he didn't do it on his own. I think Chelsea is not dumber than he is, maybe the same.
18
posted on
12/08/2002 10:12:21 AM PST
by
FITZ
To: anniegetyourgun
Kansas and Kansas State on this list. Big XII bump!
19
posted on
12/08/2002 10:15:59 AM PST
by
ewing
To: anniegetyourgun
Interns: Beware!
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson