Skip to comments.
Internet spammer can't take what he dishes out
The Detroit Free Press ^
| December 6, 2002
| MIKE WENDLAND
Posted on 12/06/2002 3:43:37 PM PST by A.J.Armitage
West Bloomfield bulk e-mailer Alan Ralsky, who just may be the world's biggest sender of Internet spam, is getting a taste of his own medicine.
Ever since I wrote a story on him a couple of weeks ago (www.freep.com/money/tech/mwend22_20021122.htm), he says he's been inundated with ads, catalogs and brochures delivered by the U.S. Postal Service to his brand-new $740,000 home.
It's all the result of a well-organized campaign by the anti-spam community, and Ralsky doesn't find it funny.
"They've signed me up for every advertising campaign and mailing list there is," he told me. "These people are out of their minds. They're harassing me."
That they are. Gleefully. Almost 300 anti-Ralsky posts were made on the Slashdot.org Web site, where the plan was hatched after spam haters posted his address, even an aerial view of his neighborhood.
"Several tons of snail mail spam every day might just annoy him as much as his spam annoys me," wrote one of the anti-spammers.
Ralsky is indeed annoyed. He says he's asked Bloomfield Hills attorney Robert Harrison to sue the anti-spammers.
(Excerpt) Read more at freep.com ...
TOPICS: Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Extended News; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: alanralsky; ralsky; scum; spam
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-32 next last
Here's a
Slashdot thread about it. I'll give you a warning, though. When you see
this post, avert your eyes, because it has a spamming lowlife's personal information, which is an FR no-no. I wouldn't want to be responsible for leading you astray, so you've had fair notice. If by some chance you see it, don't do anything with it, because that would be
very naughty, and Santa will give you coal.
To: A.J.Armitage
To: A.J.Armitage
Minnow Pond Dr., eh? LOL.
3
posted on
12/06/2002 3:49:13 PM PST
by
Eala
To: Eala
(Oops. Did I commit a no-no?)
4
posted on
12/06/2002 3:50:04 PM PST
by
Eala
To: A.J.Armitage
Some coal would be nice for Christmas in exchange for giving spammers a taste of their own medicine. Some of the junk I get in my E-mail is really revolting and that's just the header. I never open the stuff.
5
posted on
12/06/2002 3:50:06 PM PST
by
Arkie2
To: A.J.Armitage
Gee. I was having a pretty rotten day until now. Thanks for making me smile!
My hotmail account is practically worthless cuz of all the spam. I've had to get new accounts several times but the crap always catches up with me. I bet its a lot harder to move to a new house.
Poor guy, I really feel for him...
6
posted on
12/06/2002 4:02:15 PM PST
by
ibbryn
To: Arkie2
Some of the junk I get in my E-mail is really revolting and that's just the header. I never open the stuff.I agree. Not only spam but other abuses of e-mail that have just about rendered a really great way to communicate difficult, risky and uncertain.
I hate to say it, but it may need to be "Regulated".(sigh)
7
posted on
12/06/2002 4:03:04 PM PST
by
elbucko
To: Eala
(Oops. Did I commit a no-no?)Yes, you did. Mistress Zelda will now spank you.
To: elbucko
Actually, I think this sort of regulation is just fine. No government and nobody (yet) has gotten kneecapped.
9
posted on
12/06/2002 4:11:38 PM PST
by
jammer
To: A.J.Armitage
This post requires an Obligatory Monty Python routine. "Or you can have spam, spam, spam, eggs and spam."
10
posted on
12/06/2002 4:14:45 PM PST
by
TheHound
To: elbucko
I hate to say it, but it may need to be "Regulated".(sigh)Civil society, and the spontaneous order created by free actors can handle the regulation, as we're seeing here.
*Not that I'd recommend anything.*
And as a special reminder, don't do anything with this, and don't even look at it.
To: A.J.Armitage
Even a hardcore Libertarian could not object to anti-spam legislation that permitted anyone to send anything they want, but only if they identify unsolicited bulk mailings with a code in then header to enable filtering. A simple requirement to provide accurate consumer information.
(Today, I got an email that started playing an audio/video commercial, and it kept playing even after I deleted it! I had to shout (I'll leave in this typo!) down the email software to stop the noise.)
To: Beelzebubba
I certainly wouldn't object. It wouldn't ever actually be included, since they'd go off-shore, but at least you could track down the guilty parties and charge them with leaving out the code. I'm sure you could find lots of volunteers to help catch them, and even more to administer creative punishments.
To: ibbryn
Want to strike back at the malicious & childish clowns who send spam and viruses? Look here:
-http://www.all-nettools.com/tools1.htm--
... for online traceroutes and other help, so you can email all the ISP's in the chain that propagated the garbage, and let them investigate.
14
posted on
12/06/2002 4:32:57 PM PST
by
backhoe
To: A.J.Armitage
"And as a special reminder, don't do anything with this, and don't even look at it"
When you don't look at it you therefore won't notice that there is a misprint:
"Bloowfield" should be Bloomfield". I'm just pointing this out so that if you see anyone who has written "Bloowfield" anywhere, you will know he has been naughty and you can report him to Santa
15
posted on
12/06/2002 4:36:51 PM PST
by
APBaer
To: APBaer
Thanks. You get a Risk card.
To: ibbryn
I'm now using Yahoo mail for about %99 of my mail needs. They seem to really care about stopping spam, I rarely get spam in my Yahoo mailbox and when I do I report it right away. They shut down the spammers right quick. My Hotmail/MSN account, on the other hand, has become worthless due to spam. I get 90 spams for every real letter, hence the account has become useless and I no longer access it.
To: Billy_bob_bob
I have also been real happy with yahoo.I get virtually no spam.As opposed to hotmail,where I used to get tons.
18
posted on
12/06/2002 5:38:38 PM PST
by
Drippy
To: A.J.Armitage
Is a permit to air drop leaflets required? How about parachuting I-don't-CARE packages of emergency SPAM?
To: elbucko
Physical junk mail is regulated, however. He can't receive offensive porn catalogs from mass mailers without specifically giving them permission to send it to him (some anti-spammers may have "approved" such mailings on his behalf but that may violate some laws).
20
posted on
12/06/2002 9:15:57 PM PST
by
weegee
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-32 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson