[syriacus]

The comments are different than before, too.

The second one is VERY suspicious....

Viewer Poll: Poll Comments

It would be a real eye-opener for NYT readers to get a view that's different from their weird, ultra-lib editorial page.	12/06/02 7:55:43 AM MST
Hurry up, seminar voters..it's 100% truth (no) so far. Are you guys awake yet..Hello...hello...	12/06/02 7:50:43 AM MST
Diversity, anyone? Not at the N.Y,Slimes..EVER!!	12/06/02 7:49:13 AM MST
Once again, the Times demonstrates it's all for diversity: except when it comes to the only kind of diversity that matters - diversity of thought.	12/06/02 7:36:27 AM MST

Back Home

[ofMagog]

On-line "polls" are totally useless, other than it keeps those with double digit IQs busy. Anyone can vote as many times as they have the time to waste, even on those "polls" that allegedly allow only one vote.