Posted on 12/05/2002 2:24:50 PM PST by Coeur de Lion
Ibrahim Hooper, communications director of the Council on American-Islamic Relations, is incensed at derogatory statements about Muhammad made by Jerry Falwell and Pat Robertson - the former referred to the prophet as a "terrorist," the latter as an "absolute wild-eyed fanatic."
Hooper responded in kind, comparing the reverends to Osama bin Laden on the grounds that they seek to "divide the world into a religious war." The entire exchange would hardly be worth noting except for a final dig by Mr. Hooper: "Conservative evangelical leaders," he said, "would kill Muslims if given the chance."
The assertion is ludicrous. Regardless of whether Falwell's and Robertson's remarks are distasteful, or even factually correct, there's no logical connection between insulting Islam's founder and slaughtering his followers.
Still, Hooper's charge is worth dwelling on. Note those final four words: if given the chance. For even if Falwell and Robertson did harbor genocidal impulses towards Muslims (which, of course, they don't), they could never act on them.
Consider: American citizens enjoy mind-boggling freedoms compared with those of Muslim nations, yet apparently feel constrained from waging rogue wars against foreign interests. Citizens of Muslim nations, on the other hand, where individual liberties are tightly circumscribed by repressive, tyrannical regimes, apparently feel free to hatch, organize and carry out homicidal assaults against whatever infidel targets present themselves.
The contrast is instructive. Notwithstanding Mr. Hooper's evangelical paranoia, hundreds of Americans surely have the maniacal will, the technical expertise and even the financial wherewithal to, say, arrange the hijacking of an Air Jordan passenger flight in order to dive it straight into the Dome of the Rock. But they will not get the chance.
Their friends and families would hear them planning it, their neighbors and co-workers would observe them coordinating it . . . and someone, somewhere would drop that dime. Law-enforcement agencies would be tipped off, and the operation snuffed out before it ever got off the ground.
This imperative seems lost among Muslim cultures. Americans might not squeal on their countrymen for lying, cheating or stealing, but few of us would fail to report a plot to murder innocent civilians.
Think of it as the Code of the Unabomber's Brother. Where, in the Muslim world, are the Unabomber's brothers?
That, indeed, is another sign of the superiority of our culture to Islamic culture: We keep a lid on our lunatics.
I can see how that would make you feel uneasy.The bottom line is, evangelical Christian leaders are tolerated in this free society, and are conspiciously in the minority.That does not mean that everything they say is disputed, especially when what they say is not a matter of faith, but of truth.
I have not heard anything factually disputed in their summation of Islam.All I have heard is PC attempts to silence the truth.One does not need to be a Christian to note the vast difference in refuting their words and the frantic but feeble attempts by Islam to silence the truth.
No evangelical Southern Baptist believes I, personally, am going to heaven.Not a single one of them believes their God would approve of them actually killing me and sending me to the hell they believe awaits my soul.In a major point of doctrinal difference from Islam, the radical evangelical Southern Baptist who murdered me for my un-belief, would be condemned by both his God, and universally by his fellow faith practictioners.
Do you begin to see the difference now?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.