Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NY Times cites "editorial standards" in refusal to run two sports columns
Associated Press ^ | 12-4-02 | LISA SINGHANIA, AP Business Writer

Posted on 12/04/2002 4:10:54 PM PST by Oldeconomybuyer

Edited on 04/13/2004 2:41:28 AM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

NEW YORK (AP) -- The New York Times said Wednesday two sports columns about Augusta National Golf Club's men-only membership policy were killed because they failed to meet newsroom standards, not because they disagreed with the stance taken by the newspaper's editorial page.


(Excerpt) Read more at sfgate.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Political Humor/Cartoons; Politics/Elections; US: New York
KEYWORDS: clymers; hootie; masters
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-42 next last

1 posted on 12/04/2002 4:10:54 PM PST by Oldeconomybuyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
It saddens me to see the Grey lady slowly kill herself like this.

giggle

2 posted on 12/04/2002 4:13:35 PM PST by Republic of Texas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Republic of Texas
I never thought I'd be saying it, but:

The Times has become a joke. And to think when I was a kid I thought it'd be great to work there!

3 posted on 12/04/2002 4:16:03 PM PST by JennysCool
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Republic of Texas
Where are the cries of censorship that would rain down on the Washington Times if the shoe was on the other foot?
4 posted on 12/04/2002 4:16:08 PM PST by ECM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
The Times would be a great newspaper, except all that ink affects its absorbency.
5 posted on 12/04/2002 4:16:13 PM PST by IronJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JennysCool
"Newspaper standards" my ass. That's Raines-speak for saying since you don't agree with the party line, it ain't suitable for publication in the New York Times . Of course that's par for what is now New York's NOW house organ.
6 posted on 12/04/2002 4:18:08 PM PST by goldstategop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
I guess any publication can have "editorial standards" even if they have to set them at the bottom. The New York times has become nothing but a propaganda piece.
7 posted on 12/04/2002 4:20:08 PM PST by FreePaul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
The New York Times lies just like their hero white trash scumbag Clinton. The Agusta National Golf club will do what is right for them regardless what the NYT thinks or writes and that burns their balls (If they have any?)
8 posted on 12/04/2002 4:21:57 PM PST by Texbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Republic of Texas
"We hope no member of our staff really needs this assurance that our news columns enforce no 'party line,"' Boyd said.

Was that said in a straight face?

I disagree that the way the Times is going will hurt it. As a matter of fact, I think it's brilliant. Its position as the "paper of record" is now in the trash, or hope it soon will be. But marketing-wise, the paper has decided that it will serve the niche of ultra-liberal readers. That's a wiser decision than being in objective middle and get savaged by papers both on the right and the left. Its competition are other liberal rags like the Daily News. The New York Post, on the other hand, serves all the conservatives in New York (unfortunately there aren't nearly as many of them). Just like FoxNews, they have a lock on that group since there is no competition.

I predict that the circulation of the Times will actually increase thanks to its rabid liberal twist of the news. However, in the long run, there are so many more national liberal papers than conservative ones that they will hurt each other while the Wall Street Journal and Washington Times clean up.
9 posted on 12/04/2002 4:22:27 PM PST by winner3000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
YUP...."All the News that's Fit to Print".....ACCORDING TO H. Raines and the liberals, that is.
10 posted on 12/04/2002 4:22:53 PM PST by goodnesswins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
Just for the sheer comedic effect, I wish ole Hootie would go to the local Hooter's, pick out the sexiest 20 year old Georgia peach and make her a member.
11 posted on 12/04/2002 4:23:36 PM PST by Vigilantcitizen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ECM
The Washington Times would print the differing stories, and write another highlighting the fact of the widely varying opinions. Of course, that's a REAL newspaper.
12 posted on 12/04/2002 4:24:55 PM PST by Republic of Texas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: winner3000
You might be right about going left to boost local circulation. But their national credibility is going down the toilet along with it, which is ok with me.
13 posted on 12/04/2002 4:26:48 PM PST by Republic of Texas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
The order must have come from the RNC, through Rush Limbaugh. Al Gore said it was so.
14 posted on 12/04/2002 4:27:19 PM PST by Paul Atreides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
"We hope no member of our staff really needs this assurance that our news columns enforce no 'party line,"' Boyd said.

Curious historical coincidence: the editor of Pravda made the identical statement in 1947. One gullible reporter took him at his word and wrote a story mildly critical of Pravda's position of the summer wheat harvest.

He was last seen entering Lubyanka Prison.

15 posted on 12/04/2002 4:28:49 PM PST by governsleastgovernsbest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: viligantcitizen
I think they should let the first female member be Linda Tripp, or Paula Jones. The TIMES people would have collective strokes!
16 posted on 12/04/2002 4:30:13 PM PST by Enterprise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: goodnesswins
"All the News that's Fit to Print"

'We Only Print the Views that Fit'
17 posted on 12/04/2002 4:30:36 PM PST by Mike Fieschko
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
Gimme a thousand words on the First Amendment. Anyone ?
18 posted on 12/04/2002 4:32:06 PM PST by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: viligantcitizen
"Gentleman, all in favor of waiving, in the case of our newest member, the requirement that members wear green jackets at all times, kindly say 'Aye'. Adopted unanimously!"


19 posted on 12/04/2002 4:32:38 PM PST by governsleastgovernsbest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Paul Atreides
I take it this news came out too late today for Rush to discuss it. I wonder what he will have to say tomorrow.
20 posted on 12/04/2002 4:35:41 PM PST by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-42 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson