The pro homo-activist had all the talking points down. NARTH not being recognized by the APA: Only because the APA wont accept research (regardless of validity) negative to the practice of homosexuality. Ex-Gays being seen in gay bars: Does entering a gay bar make one change their orientation, NO. That research points to homosexuality being born that way: Every piece of research pointing that way is riddled with flaws, bias, outcome based research, volunteer studies and on and on.
Too bad conservatives arent motivated like the pro homo-activists are to learn the research and debate with enough venom to keep the purveyors of perversion at bay. Sigh!
All the research I needed about the "being born that way" contention was found when I read what Paul penned in 1st Corinthians 10:13.
Hat-Trick
You're not describing a debate - you're describing a verbal mugging. When I see people do this they never respond to the issue - they just chant their mantra over and over again even if it's wrong.
I heard the debate on Sean's radio show-thought it was really good. And did not believe the homosexual activist made his points well, in fact, I thought he sounded whiney and defensive.