Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: j_tull
Yea, I heard him too. Nicolosi as are most conservatives don’t have the debating skills the left does, i.e. being able to talk over someone and respond to points at the same time a’la (Begalla, McCauliff, Carville, et al). This homo activist has the skill. I only know of only two conservatives able to debate like the lefty pro’s do, Mark Levin and Ann Coulter. (Maybe Bill Bennett.) Rush, Sean, G.Gordon couldn’t debate their way out of a wet paper bag if they wanted to, how sad for our side.

The pro homo-activist had all the talking points down. NARTH not being recognized by the APA: Only because the APA won’t accept research (regardless of validity) negative to the practice of homosexuality. Ex-Gays being seen in gay bars: Does entering a gay bar make one change their “orientation”, NO. That research points to homosexuality being born that way: Every piece of research “pointing that way” is riddled with flaws, bias, outcome based research, volunteer studies… and on and on.

Too bad conservatives aren’t motivated like the pro homo-activists are to learn the research and debate with enough venom to keep the purveyors of perversion at bay. Sigh!

10 posted on 12/04/2002 7:56:24 AM PST by Clint N. Suhks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: Clint N. Suhks
That research points to homosexuality being born that way: Every piece of research “pointing that way” is riddled with flaws, bias, outcome based research, volunteer studies… and on and on.

All the research I needed about the "being born that way" contention was found when I read what Paul penned in 1st Corinthians 10:13.

Hat-Trick

19 posted on 12/04/2002 9:31:23 AM PST by Hat-Trick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: Clint N. Suhks
If anyone saw it, Nicolosi was worthless. He didn’t refute one assertion from the professional Homo-activist. He maybe spoke 10 words. What a disappointment.

59 posted on 12/04/2002 6:01:32 PM PST by Clint N. Suhks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: Clint N. Suhks
most conservatives don’t have the debating skills the left does, i.e. being able to talk over someone and respond to points at the same time

You're not describing a debate - you're describing a verbal mugging. When I see people do this they never respond to the issue - they just chant their mantra over and over again even if it's wrong.

76 posted on 12/04/2002 6:52:55 PM PST by Frapster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: Clint N. Suhks
I would LOVE to see a study done on the honchos at the APA responsible for proclaiming homosexuality as AOK. My guess is that the APA is full of homosexual psychologists, looking for reasons to proclaim themselves biologically honed.

I heard the debate on Sean's radio show-thought it was really good. And did not believe the homosexual activist made his points well, in fact, I thought he sounded whiney and defensive.

99 posted on 12/04/2002 8:39:07 PM PST by Republic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson