Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: chilepepper
You make some good comments, especially regarding MS's parasitic aquisition of programmers. MS also has one other big advantage over the decentralised, open-source system: they can centrally direct and co-ordinate, in an organized way, the development of their system, while open-source depends on the individual's initiative.

That said, one would've predicted that open-source would NEVER have been able to compete - yet they have.

Don't give up yet.
12 posted on 12/03/2002 11:02:12 AM PST by canuck_conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: canuck_conservative
in an organized way, the development of their system, while open-source depends on the individual's initiative.

That was a huge problem for me. I did some LINUX stuff. Another developer after final tests on my suff commented out some of my code to test his code that depended on mine in some manner. It created huge problem that got on 200,000 distribution CD's. Commercial organiztions would not allow that to happen.

That is when I said take your open source and shove it. I wouldn't put up with that for money... let alone for free.

17 posted on 12/03/2002 11:40:03 AM PST by Common Tator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson