Replies

I'm starting to worry that Bush has backed himself into a corner with these inspections. Whether or not they find anything, Saddam still needs to be removed.

No matter how "intrusive" the inspections are, they cannot find everything. Most of the country is a damn wasteland, lots of places to build underground bunkers, etc. Are the inspectors going to be there forever? Having them there does not change Saddam's *intention* to have WMD.

It only takes one leak in the net for Saddam to funnel HE Uranium, or the various CB agents over the border to Al Queda, and that may well be enough for another even bigger Sept. 11.

Also , these inspectors can do nothing about Saddam funneling *cash* to Al Queda, Hezzbollah , and your local Palestinian indepedant terrorist contractors.

I'm reminded what the Israelis told us about airport security. They said the Americans looks for weapons, whereas the Israelis look for *terrorists*. Now, who has been more effective re airport security? The WMD in Iraq is not the problem, it is Saddam the terrorist.

Bush et al must know this fact. I just wonder how they will explain the continuing need for removing Saddam to the American public, even though the inspectors will find nothing.

I'm starting to worry that Bush has backed himself into a corner with these inspections. Whether or not they find anything, Saddam still needs to be removed.

The Iraqis KNEW that we would want to look at Saddamned's palaces when the inspections started again. We won't find anything there. I'm really starting to have SERIOUS doubts about these "inspectors". Did you all read the article at WND about one of these inspectors? Why did the UN pick whacko's for this job?

I'm starting to worry that Bush has backed himself into a corner with these inspections.

Charles Krauthammer, when he appears on FNC with the beltway boys, has been warning about this for awhile. Cause for concern, no doubt.